TE and TM polarization parallel definition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the orientation of the electric field in a provided photo related to TE and TM polarization. It is noted that the electric field is neither parallel to the X nor Z direction, raising questions about its actual alignment. In TM waves, or p-polarization, the electric field is parallel to the plane of incidence, while the magnetic field remains transverse to it. Clarification is sought on the specific orientation of the electric field in the context of the image. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping the principles of polarization in electromagnetic waves.
yefj
Messages
58
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement: TE and TM polarization parralel question
Relevant Equations: its a photo

Hello, In the photo on the left bellow E-field is not parralel not to X nor to Z direction.
to what exactly is it parralel?
Thanks.
1733147998302.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yefj said:
Hello, In the photo on the left bellow E-field is not parralel not to X nor to Z direction.
to what exactly is it parralel?

In the TM wave ("p-polarization"), the electric field is parallel to the plane of incidence and the magnetic field is transverse (perpendicular) to the plane of incidence.

1733156800304.png
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Electric and magnetic field lines in a plane wave of finite extent
Replies
1
Views
1K
Define the polarization in TE/TM modes
Replies
4
Views
17K
Definition of transmission & reflection in TE/TM
Replies
12
Views
6K
A Why are only TM waves allowed in this geometry? (Planar interface)
Replies
0
Views
972
Finding Fresnel coefficients from the interface conditions
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Why is the electric field in y direction in a TE guided wave?
Replies
5
Views
1K
What Determines the Orientation of Magnetic Fields in TE Modes?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Fresnel's equation with complex n
Replies
5
Views
23K
I Approximate a plane E&M wave with this large sum....
Replies
2
Views
1K
Understanding TE Mode in Waveguides: Effects of Linear Polarization
Replies
3
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top