Teacher's teachings are questionable

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter poprocks4
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the accuracy of physics concepts being taught in an eighth-grade science class, specifically focusing on formulas related to force, gravity, joules, and the effects of air resistance. Participants express concerns about the teacher's understanding and the implications for students' learning in a physics/energy unit.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the teacher's formulas, suggesting that force is defined as mass times acceleration, not specifically the acceleration due to gravity.
  • Another participant points out that gravity accelerates objects at 9.8 m/s², but this is only applicable at the Earth's surface and varies with distance from the Earth and on other planets.
  • Some participants argue that air resistance does have an effect outside a vacuum, contradicting the teacher's claim.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of a joule, with some participants noting that it is the energy required to move one Newton over one meter, while others clarify the dimensional analysis of joules.
  • One participant suggests that the teacher may not have a strong background in physics, possibly due to her educational focus being on life sciences or education.
  • Concerns are raised about how to address the teacher's potential inaccuracies respectfully and privately, without causing disruption in the classroom.
  • Some participants highlight that verbal typos can occur in teaching, and that the teacher may not be making more errors than students themselves.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the formula for force presented by the teacher is specifically for weight on Earth, and provides the universal law of gravitation as a more accurate representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the accuracy of the teacher's statements, with no consensus reached on whether the teacher's teachings are fundamentally correct or incorrect. The discussion remains unresolved as participants present differing interpretations and corrections.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the teacher's knowledge and the context in which the physics concepts are taught. Participants also note the dependency on specific conditions, such as location on Earth for gravitational acceleration.

poprocks4
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am currently in eighth grade science, in a physics/energy unit. My teacher does not seem to know what she is doing, and I question her knowledge of what she is teaching. Here are some of the formulas and theories she insists are true:

-force(N) =mass x 9.8m/s/s

-The force gravity exerts on objects is 9.8m/s/s

-one joule=force required to accelerate an object at 9.8m/s/s

Also she insists that air resistance has no effect OUTSIDE a vacuum
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wasn't exposed to Physics until grade 11...the times they are a-changing...anyway, if you think these statements are false, how would you re-write them as true statements? And welcome to the Physics Forums.
 
I would say that force=mass x acceleration (not nessesarily the acceleration of gravity though)

gravity accelerates objects at 9.8m/s/s

one joule=one Newton/metre

air resistance has an effect outside a vacuum
 
Last edited:
Most people my age did not get physics until High School at best. It was not required. General Science took into account some very shaky physics. There is so much on the internet now that if you want to, especially as an 8th grader, learn a heck of a lot on your own.

At least you don't have to rely on a new set of encyclopedias to find out what was going on like people a little older than I am.

Gravity has an effect inside a vacuum as well. Gravity does not stop acting in the absence of air. Now if the Earth was to suddenly disappear...
 
Its not the actual physics class, but a physics unit in a regular science class.
Also, i made some typos in my last post, which i edited; i meant to say air resistance instead of gravity. of course gravity has an effect inside a vacuum (:
 
poprocks4 said:
Its not the actual physics class, but a physics unit in a regular science class.
Also, i made some typos in my last post, which i edited; i meant to say air resistance instead of gravity. of course gravity has an effect inside a vacuum (:

It is possible your teacher was an education major or a life science major and physics was never taught to her properly so hang in there and visit this site. :smile:

You don't find many Physics majors wandering the streets looking for a job teaching science sadly to say. And you will find in years to come that there are some Physics types that know a heck of a lot about Physics, but have no idea how to make others understand it. What seems completely logical, intuitive and obvious to one person may be a sea of confusion to another. Good teachers usually have a good feel for what others find difficult and can ask appropriate questions that lead students to what is reasonable. My worst Physics teacher was probably one of the most valuable to the University due to his research.
 
poprocks4 said:
I would say that force=mass x acceleration (not nessesarily the acceleration of gravity though)

gravity accelerates objects at 9.8m/s/s

one joule=one Newton/metre

air resistance has an effect outside a vacuum

Almost! The units for joule is Newton*metre. The third one has a little caveat though, 1 joule is the energy required to supply a constant force of 1 Newton over a distance of 1 meter. That is how it is defined. What you stated is simply the dimensions of Joules (although multiplying instead of dividing).

Also, "gravity" accelerating objects at 9.8m/s^2 is only good for the surface of the Earth. If you get further out from the Earth, it changes. Likewise, on different planets the gravitational acceleration is different (notice how people who walked on the moon seemed to accelerate downward at a slower rate?).
 
ok, so now do I tell the teacher she is teaching the class wrong or just let it go
 
poprocks4 said:
ok, so now do I tell the teacher she is teaching the class wrong or just let it go

With a lot of respect and in private, do NOT take the argument into the classroom.
 
  • #10
integral said:
with a lot of respect and in private, do not take the argument into the classroom.

+1...
 
  • #11
You wrote "gravity" when you meant "air-resistance", which was a typo. But there is such a thing as verbal typos, you know. When you're saying a lot of things to a lot of people in a classroom, you're bound to make mistakes. I can easily imagine someone saying "the force is 9.8 m/sec^2" when they meant acceleration. You can go back and correct your typos, but she can't. On balance I don't think she's made any more false statements than you have yourself, e.g. saying a joule = Newton/metre. Your own language isn't exact enough for you to be picking up on hers.
 
  • #12
The first equation for force isn't the equation for force but rather for weight on Earth.

Your teacher's gravity formula only works on Earth, the full formula is:

[tex]F=\frac{Gm_{1}m_{2}}{d^2}[/tex]

The Joule is the unit for work, and is defined as N*m. The force required to accelerate an object at 9.8m/s/s can be calculated using the formula F=ma.

Finally, the fourth statement is the opposite of what it should be: air resistance only has an effect where there is air (i.e. not in a vacuum)
 
  • #13
Ketman said:
You wrote "gravity" when you meant "air-resistance", which was a typo. But there is such a thing as verbal typos, you know. When you're saying a lot of things to a lot of people in a classroom, you're bound to make mistakes. I can easily imagine someone saying "the force is 9.8 m/sec^2" when they meant acceleration. You can go back and correct your typos, but she can't. On balance I don't think she's made any more false statements than you have yourself, e.g. saying a joule = Newton/metre. Your own language isn't exact enough for you to be picking up on hers.

Sorry my english is not too good
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K