Tensile Test of Slip Ring - Working out Tensile Strength

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the tensile testing of slip rings according to the now-withdrawn BS HC 403:1977 standard. The key formula for calculating tensile strength is provided as S = (3*P*((D/t)-1)) / b*t, where S represents stress, P is load, D is outer diameter, t is radial thickness, and b is width. The user seeks clarification on the derivation of the force component in the formula, specifically how Force = 3P((D/t) - 1) is established from the tensile testing process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile testing principles
  • Familiarity with the BS HC 403:1977 standard
  • Knowledge of stress and strain calculations
  • Basic grasp of mechanical properties of materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of tensile strength formulas in mechanical engineering
  • Study the historical context and applications of BS HC 403:1977
  • Explore modern tensile testing techniques and standards
  • Learn about the mechanical properties of slip rings and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, materials scientists, and quality control professionals involved in tensile testing and material strength analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Delvaurius
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
All,

Through work, I've recently been tasked with investigating a very old tensile test technique, according to BS HC 403:1977 (now withdrawn).

Essentially, you take a ring. Anywhere along it you make a slit all the way through. You then pull that ring in a tensile machine, ensuring that the slit is perpendicular to the direction of force.

The standard then states, to work out the tensile strength, use the equation:

S = (3*P*((D/t)-1)) / b*t

S = Stress, P = Load, D = Outer Diameter, t = radial thickness, b = width.

Now I get the whole thing over (b*t) where b*t is the cross sectional area of the ring, meeting S=F/A.

How is Force = 3P((D/t) - 1) derived?

Thanks for any help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In your converted formula F = P; instead, you should be seeking the derivation of the original formula as stated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K