Tension developed in a charged ring

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at the circumference of a charged ring, where tension in the ring is balanced by the electric field. The derived equation for tension is T = EQ/(2π), and the field due to an infinitesimal charge is expressed as dE = k(dq)/z². However, the integral to find the net electric field at the circumference does not converge, suggesting an infinite field, which raises questions about the calculations. The user also notes that calculating the field at any point in the plane of the ring proved too complex for computational tools. The divergence of the electric field at a line charge is acknowledged, indicating a deeper physical significance.
Hamiltonian
Messages
296
Reaction score
193
Homework Statement
calculate the tension developed in ring of radius ##R##( of negligible thickness) and charge ##Q##
Relevant Equations
-
1622133322336.png

consider a small element that subtends an angle ##2\Delta \theta## at the center of the ring. balancing the forces on this element gives:
(let the field due to the ring be at its circumference be ##E##).
$$2T\Delta \theta = E(dq) = E (\frac{Q}{2\pi})(2\Delta \theta)$$
$$T = \frac{EQ}{2\pi}$$
now the problem is reduced to finding the field due to the charged ring at its circumference:
1622133693717.png

let the distance from an infinitesimal charge ##(dq)## to the required point on the circumference be ##z##
$$z^2 = (Rsin\theta + R)^2 + (Rcos\theta)^2 = 2R^2(1+sin\theta)$$
$$(dE) = k(dq)/z^2 = \frac {k(dq)}{2R^2(1+sin\theta)}$$
by symmetry arguments the net field at the circumference will be only in the y direction:
$$(dE_{net}) = (dE)(cos\alpha)$$
$$\alpha = \pi/4 - \theta/2$$
$$(dq) = (Q/2\pi) d\theta$$
$$dE_{net} = k(dq)\frac{cos(\pi/4 - \theta/2)}{1+sin\theta} = \frac{kQ}{4\pi R^2} \frac{cos(\pi/4 - \theta/2)}{1+sin\theta} (d\theta)$$
$$E_{net} = \frac{kQ}{4\pi R^2} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{cos(\pi/4 - \theta/2)}{1+sin\theta} d\theta$$

I put the integral into wolframalpha and it does not converge!
that would mean the field is infinite which obviously can't be true.
is there any physical significance to this or have i made a mistake in calculating the field at the circumference of the ring.

I had also tried to find the field at any general point in the plane of the ring and then wanted to find the field at circumference but the integral proved to be very complex (wolframalpha exceeded standard computation timeo_O) hence i didn't go down that path.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And a point charge !
 
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
779
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
289
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K