Tensor algabra, dummy indices manipulation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves manipulating dummy indices in a tensor algebra context, specifically relating to an expression involving tensors and their indices. The original poster seeks to demonstrate an equality involving the summation of tensor components.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of dummy indices and their interchangeable properties. There is a focus on the implications of tensor non-commutativity and the challenges of maintaining index order during manipulation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the properties of dummy indices, while others express confusion regarding the manipulation of indices and the rules governing them. There is an ongoing exploration of the topic without a clear consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the source of the problem from a textbook on relativity, indicating a potential background knowledge requirement. There are references to issues with LaTeX formatting in the forum, which may affect the clarity of mathematical expressions shared among participants.

roberto85
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show by manipulating the dummy indices, that

(Z[tex]\underline{abc}[/tex] + Z[tex]\underline{cab}[/tex] + Z[tex]\underline{bca}[/tex])X[tex]\overline{a}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{b}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{c}[/tex] = 3Z[tex]\underline{abc}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{a}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{b}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{c}[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This question comes from Ray D'Inverno's book - Introducing Einstein's Relativity and is on page 67 ex. 5.3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roberto85 said:

Homework Statement



Show by manipulating the dummy indices, that

(Z[tex]\underline{abc}[/tex] + Z[tex]\underline{cab}[/tex] + Z[tex]\underline{bca}[/tex])X[tex]\overline{a}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{b}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{c}[/tex] = 3Z[tex]\underline{abc}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{a}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{b}[/tex]X[tex]\overline{c}[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This question comes from Ray D'Inverno's book - Introducing Einstein's Relativity and is on page 67 ex. 5.3

The thing to realize about dummy indices is that they have no intrinsic meaning except that
they are to be summed over. Thus, in the product

[tex]z_{abc}x^a x^b x^c[/tex]

you can replace a with d and the meaning is the same. You might want to systematically replace each of your given letters with another letter and shuffle the x's around so that you can change back to a,b,c in the order you want.
 
AEM said:
The thing to realize about dummy indices is that they have no intrinsic meaning except that
they are to be summed over. Thus, in the product

[tex]z_{abc}x^a x^b x^c[/tex]

you can replace a with d and the meaning is the same. You might want to systematically replace each of your given letters with another letter and shuffle the x's around so that you can change back to a,b,c in the order you want.

Aren't tensors non-commutative? If so you couldn't 'shuffle' the x's as you say right?
I'm trying to solve this exercise but I get a little confused in what one is allowed or not to do with dummy indices...
I can't seem to get the indices in the right order because if I change an 'a' with a 'b' in the Z tensor, then I must change the letters in the x's. Or am I missing something?

Thanks in advance...
 
Hi Roberto85,

I see you are having problems with the LateX editor on the forum too. I've given up and now have a LateX editor which produces nice PDFs like the one attached. Hope you find it useful.

Regards


TerryW
 

Attachments

Hi Roberto,

A few additional thoughts.


Regards


TerryW
 

Attachments

TerryW said:
Hi Roberto,

A few additional thoughts.


Regards


TerryW

Hi Terry, thankyou so much for such a helpful and detailed post. I've saved the pdf's for future reference because i gave up on tensors for my relativity course but i still have the book and fully intend to learn about relativity in the future. :)
 
Hi Roberto,

Best of luck. I never did GR in my undergrad years but always wanted to understand it. I tried a couple of times during my working life to get to grips with it but never really had the time. I'm retired now and at last have had the chance to devote some time to it. I'm now up to Chapter 18 and have managed to crack all the problems except for about 4. I t was 8 at one time but I keep going back and having another look at them. As you go on, you just get a better feel for what is going on and then the answers pop up! So it might be many years before you get around to it but I'm sure you'll find it's worth it in the end.RegardsTerryW
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K