Tensor decomposition, Sym representations and irreps.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between tensor decomposition and symmetric representations in group theory, specifically addressing the irreducibility of subrepresentations. The tensor decomposition into Tab = T[ab] + T(traceless){ab} + Tr(T{ab}) does not guarantee that the resulting subrepresentations are irreducible. Furthermore, while Symn representations are associated with irreducible representations of finite groups, it is established that not all Symn representations are irreducible due to the finite nature of group representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, particularly representations and irreducibility.
  • Familiarity with tensor decomposition techniques in mathematical physics.
  • Knowledge of finite groups and their properties.
  • Basic comprehension of invariant subspaces in linear algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of irreducible representations in finite group theory.
  • Explore tensor decomposition methods in detail, focusing on applications in physics.
  • Investigate the relationship between Symn representations and their applications in combinatorial mathematics.
  • Learn about invariant subspaces and their role in representation theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of group theory who are interested in the intricacies of tensor decomposition and its implications for symmetric representations and irreducibility.

knowwhatyoudontknow
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Tensor decomposition, Sym[SUB]n[/SUB] representations and irreps.
New to group theory. I have 3 questions:

1. Tensor decomposition into Tab = T[ab] +T(traceless){ab} + Tr(T{ab}) leads to invariant subspaces. Is this enough to imply these subreps are irreducible?

2. The Symn representations of a group are irreps. Why?

3. What is the connection between Symn representations and tensor decomposition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to give more details and context. Are you looking at representations of finite groups?

1. I am not sure what the question is.

2. This doesn't seem right. A finite group has only finitely many irreducible representations. So the ##Sym^n## cannot be all irreducible.

3. Also not sure what you are asking.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K