Undergrad Tensor Product in QM: 1D vs 3D Hilbert Spaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between 1-D and 3-D Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing whether a 3-D Hilbert space can be expressed as the tensor product of three 1-D Hilbert spaces. It is established that the 3-D Hilbert space, denoted as ## H_3 ##, can indeed be represented as ## H_3 \equiv H_a \otimes H_b \otimes H_c ##, where each ## H_i ## is isomorphic to the others but not identical. The inner product for the 3-D space is defined as the product of the inner products of the individual 1-D spaces, confirming the tensor product structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with tensor products in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of inner product definitions and properties
  • Concept of isomorphism in mathematical spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensor products in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of isomorphic spaces in quantum theory
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of Hilbert spaces
  • Investigate the role of inner products in quantum state representation
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in functional analysis, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek a deeper understanding of Hilbert space structures and their applications in quantum theory.

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
A particle in a 1-D Hilbert space would have position basis states ## |x \rangle ## where ## \langle x' | x \rangle = \delta(x'-x) ## A 3-D Hilbert space for one particle might have a basis ## | x,y,z \rangle ## where ##\langle x', y', z' | x,y,z \rangle = \delta(x'-x) \delta (y-y') \delta(z-z') ## . Would it be correct to write ## | x,y,z \rangle = | x \rangle \otimes | y \rangle \otimes | z \rangle ## ? Why or why not?

Call the 1-D Hilbert space ## H_1 ## and the 3-D Hilbert space ## H_3 ##. Is this question equivalent to asking is ## H_3 = H_1 \otimes H_1 \otimes H_1 ##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pellman said:
A particle in a 1-D Hilbert space would have position basis states ## |x \rangle ## where ## \langle x' | x \rangle = \delta(x'-x) ## A 3-D Hilbert space for one particle might have a basis ## | x,y,z \rangle ## where ##\langle x', y', z' | x,y,z \rangle = \delta(x'-x) \delta (y-y') \delta(z-z') ## . Would it be correct to write ## | x,y,z \rangle = | x \rangle \otimes | y \rangle \otimes | z \rangle ## ? Why or why not?
Yes. To see why, it's easier to look at it the other was around. The full Hilbert space is defined as the tensor product of the the three 'component' Hilbert spaces, so that a basis for the full space is the set of all tensor products of basis elements of those three component spaces: ## | x,y,z \rangle = | x \rangle \otimes | y \rangle \otimes | z \rangle ##.

We then define the inner product on the product space in the most natural way, as:
$$\langle x,y,z|x',y',z'\rangle \equiv \langle x|x'\rangle\times\langle y|y'\rangle\times\langle z|z'\rangle$$
and extending linearly. We need to confirm that this obeys the inner product rules, but that's pretty easy to do.

It then follows that
$$\langle x,y,z|x',y',z'\rangle \equiv \langle x|x'\rangle\times\langle y|y'\rangle\times\langle z|z'\rangle\equiv\delta(x'-x) \delta (y-y') \delta(z-z') $$

Call the 1-D Hilbert space ## H_1 ## and the 3-D Hilbert space ## H_3 ##. Is this question equivalent to asking is ## H_3 = H_1 \otimes H_1 \otimes H_1 ##?
The three Hilbert spaces are isomorphic to one another, but they are not the same space, as they relate to different physical phenomena. Hence it is more accurately represented by saying that thre three spaces are ##H_a,H_b,H_c##, with ##H_a\cong H_b\cong H_c## and the full Hilbert space is ##H_3\equiv H_a\otimes H_b\otimes H_c##.
 
Thank you. This was helpful.

What does ## \cong ## mean here?
 
It means 'is isomorphic to'
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K