Tensor Product of C with itself over R.

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the tensor product C⊗C over R is equivalent to C^2. The approach involves demonstrating the equivalence C⊗(R[T]/<T^2+1>) = C[T]/<T^2+1>. The user has defined a bilinear map from C×R[T]/<T^2+1> to C[T]/<T^2+1> but is struggling to find an inverse for this map. The method discussed is part of a broader concept known as complexification, applicable to any real vector space. Assistance is sought to resolve the issue with the inverse mapping.
Monobrow
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am trying to prove that C\otimesC (taken over R) is equal to C^2. The method I have seen is to show the following equivalences:
C\otimesC = C\otimes(R[T]/<T^2+1>) = C[T]/<T^2+1> = C.
(All tensor products taken over R).

The only part I am having trouble with is showing that C\otimes(R[T]/<T^2+1>) = C[T]/<T^2+1>. I have tried to show this by using the universal property of the tensor product. First I defined a bilinear map from CXR[T]/<T^2+1> to C[T]/<T^2+1> by sending an element (z,f(T)) to zf(t) (where I am omitting the cosets). This then induces a linear map from the tensor product. However, I cannot seem to find an inverse for this map.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K