Terminal masters program and PhDd

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aero51
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Masters Program
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Enrolling in a terminal master's program, particularly one designed for working professionals, does not significantly hinder the chances of acceptance into a PhD program. The discussion highlights that candidates who have completed a master's degree, even without a thesis, can still be competitive, especially if they have relevant work experience. The example provided illustrates that a non-traditional route can lead to successful PhD admissions, as long as candidates meet necessary requirements like passing comprehensive exams. Funding opportunities may vary, but they are not the primary concern for all applicants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of terminal master's programs and their structure
  • Familiarity with PhD admission processes and requirements
  • Knowledge of comprehensive exams in graduate programs
  • Awareness of funding options for graduate studies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between terminal master's programs and traditional master's programs
  • Explore the comprehensive exam requirements for various PhD programs
  • Investigate funding opportunities available for PhD candidates
  • Learn about the impact of professional experience on graduate school applications
USEFUL FOR

Prospective graduate students, academic advisors, and professionals considering a transition from industry to academia will benefit from this discussion.

Aero51
Messages
545
Reaction score
10
I have a question. If one decides to enroll in a terminal masters program (such as one designed for students with a full time job), then later leaves industry to pursue a PhD, how would that look on a PhD admittance committe vs taking the usual route of getting a masters with thesis first? Is there a significant difference in probabilities of acceptance/funding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, this isn't exactly the same, but here's my little story.

I was technically part of a PhD program (simply for funding yay) but after meeting the requirements for a masters, I decided to leave because I had a kid and I really like money. Anyway, recent life changes have given me the ability to restart a path towards a PhD (yay wife works a higher paying job!) so I applied to somewhat local Universities and have been accepted into all of them.*

Thus I am one example of a person who took a non-traditional route. Funding wise, less than expected, but this isn't a great concern of mine.

*I wasn't very far removed from my masters degree regarding work. My thesis was on statistical learning theory, and I used that in all my jobs, so it isn't like I left academics and went to Quality Control or something.
 
Aero51 said:
I have a question. If one decides to enroll in a terminal masters program (such as one designed for students with a full time job), then later leaves industry to pursue a PhD, how would that look on a PhD admittance committe vs taking the usual route of getting a masters with thesis first? Is there a significant difference in probabilities of acceptance/funding?

Our (Physics) graduate programs are terminal MS, and while I don't know of any student that has later applied to a PhD program, I suspect that as long as you pass their comprehensive exam (or the equivalent)- an exam that tests your mastery of coursework which must be passed prior to entering the research phase of a PhD program- I can't imagine it's an issue.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K