Uncovering the Mysteries of Tesla's Coil for Electromagnets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on Nikola Tesla's patent for a coil designed for electromagnets, specifically patent number 512,340. Participants debate the functionality and practical applications of this invention, suggesting that while it may not have been commercially successful, its design could theoretically reduce electromagnetic interference in devices like grid-connected power inverters. The discussion highlights the concept of self-canceling coils and their potential utility in various electrical applications, including transformers and motors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory and principles
  • Familiarity with Tesla's inventions and their historical context
  • Knowledge of electrical engineering concepts, particularly inductance and capacitance
  • Basic comprehension of patents and intellectual property rights
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the practical applications of self-canceling coils in modern electronics
  • Explore the principles of Lenz's Law and its implications in electromagnetism
  • Learn about the design and functionality of grid-connected power inverters
  • Investigate Tesla's other inventions and their impact on electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, inventors, patent researchers, and anyone interested in the historical and practical implications of Tesla's electromagnetic inventions.

toneboy1
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Computer science news on Phys.org
Actually something doesn't have to work necessarily to receive a patent. For example an umbrella with a big hole in it could be patented if you wanted, it would be useless but you could patent practically any idea. What a patent is meant to do is to protect your intellectual property so that no one rips you off. Use and or function is in the eye of the beholder.

I have no idea about this though. It seems that you could produce an electromagnetic force using this, whether the magnet would work very or better than the electromagnets of the time well I have no idea. early electromagnets were just essentially coils around a core though so?

My guess is that this worked no better than the designs at the time, and so it never really took off or made him any money. But that would be a guess.

I would of liked to of seen his death ray or his theory of gravity. :smile:
 
Last edited:
I did not know that about patents of this sort, thanks.
 
toneboy1 said:
I did not know that about patents of this sort, thanks.

Yeah the primary use of a patent is to prevent plagiarism. It working is of no real consideration in most patents although if the government offered a patent out to tender to design say the next evolution in airforce combat, it would probably expect it to work. I've seen some pretty mental patents in my time for some pretty absurd things. :smile:

Trouble is I suppose is how do you define useful. Something can work badly and still be useful somewhere. Equally someone somewhere might actually find a device that keeps your gerbil clean automatically very useful. Or self extending clown shoes: who knows?

When the guy patented the hula hoop would you of told him it wasn't patentable. I would of said this is crazy its a fricking circle, why patent that? I wonder how much money he made from them though?
 
Last edited:
Well it talks about it being a coil for electro-magnets. However, it later states that it is a self canceling coil. The double winding series connected magnetic canceling coils could be useful in products like grid connected power inverters used by the solar and wind industry on smaller home based units. The ability to cancel out it own magnetic field would in theory lessen interference with other electronics. The effects might be able to be applied to other wire types like trams mission lines, extension cords, electrical wiring in buildings to reduce exposure to high E. M. Fields. I do not know for sure I too have never seen his coil in action. I am just making some guesses from what I read in the patent.
 
So is this saying that it is reducing Lenz's law?

So this could be applied to transformers and motors theoretically too?

Thanks.
 
If I've read it correctly, he's winding it to increase the self-capacitance so it behaves more like a transmission line at the working frequency than a pure inductance...

I'm sorry, I can't think of a power-handling application as, IMHO, they're better done with separate coils and capacitors...

FWIW, the configuration looks rather like 'passive' shop-tags, with a flat spiral designed to self-resonate near the security gate frequency...
 
Nik_2213 said:
If I've read it correctly, he's winding it to increase the self-capacitance so it behaves more like a transmission line at the working frequency than a pure inductance...
That's the way I read the introduction page. The "new idea" seems to be that inductors have self-capacitance.

Of course any EE student who does a course in RF circuits knows that now, but somebody had to think of if first.

But it's often hard to be sure what Tesla was really thinking about, or if what he was thinking was actually right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
16K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K