B Test of the Universality of Free Fall with Atoms

fresh_42
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
2024 Award
Messages
20,627
Reaction score
27,780
I have found an article about an experiment that states that gravity on a small scale doesn't experience quantum effects. Of course the headline has been catchy, so I want to ask about the real importance or relevance of the experiment.

Or for short: Do the results imply any consequences on GUT's.

We report a test of the universality of free fall by comparing the gravity acceleration of the Rb87 atoms in mF=+1 versus those in mF=−1, of which the corresponding spin orientations are opposite. A Mach-Zehnder-type atom interferometer is exploited to alternately measure the free fall acceleration of the atoms in these two magnetic sublevels, and the resultant Eötvös ratio is ηS=(0.2±1.2)×10−7. This also gives an upper limit of 5.4×10−6m−2 for a possible gradient field of the spacetime torsion. The interferometer using atoms in mF=±1 is highly sensitive to the magnetic field inhomogeneity. A double differential measurement method is developed to alleviate the inhomogeneity influence, of which the effectiveness is validated by a magnetic field modulating experiment.

http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.023001
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fresh_42 said:
I have found an article about an experiment that states that gravity on a small scale doesn't experience quantum effects.
That is a misleading description.

The experiment shows that the spin of rubidium atoms does not influence the gravitational acceleration (within the experimental uncertainty, as always). It would have been really weird if it would.

Gravitational fields quantize energy states of particles, this has been demonstrated with neutrons. The gravitational field has the same role as electrostatic fields for experiments with electrons or protons.
Here is an example
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
As far as I know, gravity has only been experimentally tested against predictions of GR at scales as small as about 10^-6 meters (about 1,000 million atomic radii long), where one might expect classical behavior, even if quantum gravity effects are real, because this is far larger than the atomic scale of around 10^-15 meters.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top