Testing for Convergence or Divergence of 3/n

Click For Summary
The series from n=1 to infinity of 3/n is being analyzed for convergence or divergence. The initial approach using the Test for Divergence is incorrect, as this test cannot confirm convergence when the limit approaches zero. The limit of 3/n as n approaches infinity is indeed zero, but this does not provide definitive information about convergence. The series is identified as a harmonic series, which is known to diverge. Therefore, the series 3/n diverges.
Rossinole
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the series from n=1 to infinity of 3/n converging or diverging?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Since 3/n is not a geometric series, my guess is that we can just use the Test for Divergence and take it's limit to see if it's converging or diverging. As n->infinity, 3/n -> 0 and lim = 0, so it's converging.

However, I am not sure if this is right way to go about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rossinole said:
Since 3/n is not a geometric series,

Correct.

my guess is that we can just use the Test for Divergence and take it's limit to see if it's converging or diverging.

Not a bad guess, but beware that the Test for Divergence cannot tell you if a series converges (hence, its name).

As n->infinity, 3/n -> 0 and lim = 0, so it's converging.

Wrong. The Test for Divergence says that:

\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}a_n \neq 0 \Rightarrow \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n diverges.

Equivalently, it says that:

\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n converges \Rightarrow \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}a_n = 0

If the limit is zero, then the test yields no information and you have to use another test.
 
So I would have to treat it as a Harmonic Series?
 
It is a harmonic series.
 
Alright, thank you for your help.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K