Textbook 'The Physics of Waves': Calculating Work Done by Force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the concept of work done by force as presented in Chapter 2, Section 2.3.1 of the textbook "The Physics of Waves" from MIT's OpenCourseWare. Participants clarify that work is a nonlinear function of force, emphasizing that the power associated with a driving force is proportional to the square of its amplitude, ##F_0##. This nonlinearity is demonstrated mathematically by showing that the real part of the product of complex forces and velocities does not equal the product of their real parts. Thus, to accurately calculate power, one must first extract the real components of the complex quantities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nonlinear functions in physics
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their operations
  • Knowledge of power calculations in wave mechanics
  • Access to "The Physics of Waves" textbook, specifically Chapter 2
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical properties of nonlinear functions in physics
  • Learn about the implications of complex numbers in physical calculations
  • Review equations (2.19), (2.23), and (2.24) from "The Physics of Waves"
  • Explore the relationship between amplitude and power in wave mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of force and power calculations in nonlinear systems.

brettng
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
To calculate work done by external force on a simple harmonic oscillator, we need to use real force and real displacement, because the work is a nonlinear function of force. Show that the work is a nonlinear function of force.
Relevant Equations
##W=\int F \, dx##
Reference textbook “The Physics of Waves” in MIT website:
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-03sc-...es-fall-2016/resources/mit8_03scf16_textbook/

Chapter 2 - Section 2.3.1 [Page 45] (see attached file)

Question: In the content, it states that we need to use real force and real displacement, because the work is a nonlinear function of force.

I understand that “nonlinear” means that a linear combination of 2 forces (i.e. real part of and imaginary part for complex solution of force) is generally not a solution, even though the real part (and the imaginary part) is individually a solution. But how to show the nonlinearity explicitly with mathematics?

In other words, could anyone prove this statement please?

Grateful if someone could help. Thank you!

IMG_9115.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brettng said:
I understand that “nonlinear” means that a linear combination of 2 forces (i.e. real part of and imaginary part for complex solution of force) is generally not a solution, even though the real part (and the imaginary part) is individually a solution. But how to show the nonlinearity explicitly with mathematics?
I don't think that this is the meaning of "nonlinear" here. The power associated with the driving force is equal to the product of the real part of the force and the real part of the velocity. But the amplitude of the velocity is itself proportional to the amplitude ##F_0## of the driving force. (See equations (2.19), (2.23), and (2.24). So, the power is proportional to the square of ##F_0##. This means that the power is a nonlinear function of the driving force.

However, it seems to me that there is a more basic reason why you can't get the power by multiplying the complex force by the complex velocity and then taking the real part. In general, for complex numbers ##z_1 = a + ib## and ##z_2 = c + id##, you can easily check that ##\textrm{Re} (z_1 \cdot z_2) \neq \textrm{Re}(z_1) \textrm{Re}(z_2)##. So, to get the power of the driving force, you must first take the real parts of the complex force and the complex velocity before multiplying.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: brettng
Thank you so much for your help!!!!!!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
909
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
812
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K