Textbook 'The Physics of Waves': Calculating Work Done by Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the nonlinearity of work done by force in the context of wave physics, specifically referencing the textbook "The Physics of Waves." Participants clarify that the power associated with a driving force is nonlinear because it is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the driving force. They emphasize that taking the real parts of complex forces and velocities before multiplication is essential, as the real part of the product does not equal the product of the real parts. This distinction highlights the mathematical properties of complex numbers in relation to physical forces. The conversation seeks a deeper mathematical proof of these concepts while acknowledging the complexities involved.
brettng
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
To calculate work done by external force on a simple harmonic oscillator, we need to use real force and real displacement, because the work is a nonlinear function of force. Show that the work is a nonlinear function of force.
Relevant Equations
##W=\int F \, dx##
Reference textbook “The Physics of Waves” in MIT website:
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-03sc-...es-fall-2016/resources/mit8_03scf16_textbook/

Chapter 2 - Section 2.3.1 [Page 45] (see attached file)

Question: In the content, it states that we need to use real force and real displacement, because the work is a nonlinear function of force.

I understand that “nonlinear” means that a linear combination of 2 forces (i.e. real part of and imaginary part for complex solution of force) is generally not a solution, even though the real part (and the imaginary part) is individually a solution. But how to show the nonlinearity explicitly with mathematics?

In other words, could anyone prove this statement please?

Grateful if someone could help. Thank you!

IMG_9115.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brettng said:
I understand that “nonlinear” means that a linear combination of 2 forces (i.e. real part of and imaginary part for complex solution of force) is generally not a solution, even though the real part (and the imaginary part) is individually a solution. But how to show the nonlinearity explicitly with mathematics?
I don't think that this is the meaning of "nonlinear" here. The power associated with the driving force is equal to the product of the real part of the force and the real part of the velocity. But the amplitude of the velocity is itself proportional to the amplitude ##F_0## of the driving force. (See equations (2.19), (2.23), and (2.24). So, the power is proportional to the square of ##F_0##. This means that the power is a nonlinear function of the driving force.

However, it seems to me that there is a more basic reason why you can't get the power by multiplying the complex force by the complex velocity and then taking the real part. In general, for complex numbers ##z_1 = a + ib## and ##z_2 = c + id##, you can easily check that ##\textrm{Re} (z_1 \cdot z_2) \neq \textrm{Re}(z_1) \textrm{Re}(z_2)##. So, to get the power of the driving force, you must first take the real parts of the complex force and the complex velocity before multiplying.
 
Thank you so much for your help!!!!!!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top