Textbook 'The Physics of Waves': Calculating Work Done by Force

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the nonlinearity of work done by force in the context of wave physics, specifically referencing the textbook "The Physics of Waves." Participants clarify that the power associated with a driving force is nonlinear because it is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the driving force. They emphasize that taking the real parts of complex forces and velocities before multiplication is essential, as the real part of the product does not equal the product of the real parts. This distinction highlights the mathematical properties of complex numbers in relation to physical forces. The conversation seeks a deeper mathematical proof of these concepts while acknowledging the complexities involved.
brettng
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
To calculate work done by external force on a simple harmonic oscillator, we need to use real force and real displacement, because the work is a nonlinear function of force. Show that the work is a nonlinear function of force.
Relevant Equations
##W=\int F \, dx##
Reference textbook “The Physics of Waves” in MIT website:
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-03sc-...es-fall-2016/resources/mit8_03scf16_textbook/

Chapter 2 - Section 2.3.1 [Page 45] (see attached file)

Question: In the content, it states that we need to use real force and real displacement, because the work is a nonlinear function of force.

I understand that “nonlinear” means that a linear combination of 2 forces (i.e. real part of and imaginary part for complex solution of force) is generally not a solution, even though the real part (and the imaginary part) is individually a solution. But how to show the nonlinearity explicitly with mathematics?

In other words, could anyone prove this statement please?

Grateful if someone could help. Thank you!

IMG_9115.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brettng said:
I understand that “nonlinear” means that a linear combination of 2 forces (i.e. real part of and imaginary part for complex solution of force) is generally not a solution, even though the real part (and the imaginary part) is individually a solution. But how to show the nonlinearity explicitly with mathematics?
I don't think that this is the meaning of "nonlinear" here. The power associated with the driving force is equal to the product of the real part of the force and the real part of the velocity. But the amplitude of the velocity is itself proportional to the amplitude ##F_0## of the driving force. (See equations (2.19), (2.23), and (2.24). So, the power is proportional to the square of ##F_0##. This means that the power is a nonlinear function of the driving force.

However, it seems to me that there is a more basic reason why you can't get the power by multiplying the complex force by the complex velocity and then taking the real part. In general, for complex numbers ##z_1 = a + ib## and ##z_2 = c + id##, you can easily check that ##\textrm{Re} (z_1 \cdot z_2) \neq \textrm{Re}(z_1) \textrm{Re}(z_2)##. So, to get the power of the driving force, you must first take the real parts of the complex force and the complex velocity before multiplying.
 
Thank you so much for your help!!!!!!
 
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
919
Replies
6
Views
982
Replies
5
Views
827
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
729
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K