Intro Physics Textbooks for the math of a B.S. in Physics and Engineering?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether to prioritize practical math skills or the underlying theory. Participants suggest that for applied mathematics, particularly in engineering and physics, books like Kreyszig's and Sokolnikoff & Redheffer are more suitable than theoretical texts like Apostol's or Spivak's. Kreyszig is noted for its accessibility and relevance to engineering students, while Apostol and Spivak are considered too formal and geared towards mathematics majors, making them less appropriate for those focused on practical applications.
Fraze
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Should one focus on just the ability to DO the math or also the theory behind it? Would a the book " ISBN-10: 0521679710 " suffice or should I do something to the effect of Spivak's or Apostol's calculus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't speak ISBN, so I cant' really address your question. For applied math (engineering/physics), I recommend books like Sokolnikoff & Redheffer, and the one by Kreyszig.
 
Kreyszig is a good choice, I think. At least it was for me when I did my B.S. in the 80s in EE. We did have Apostol as a reference in our freshman calculus class, but it's going to be too formal and proofy and really meant for math majors and not suited for what you want. Same for Spivak.
 

Thread '"WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians'

The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
View full post »

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Other What to do with my old physical textbooks?
Replies
32
Views
3K
Applied A question about mathematics textbooks for physicists
Replies
34
Views
6K
Classical Looking for introductory level physics textbook
Replies
10
Views
3K
Algebra What's a good first textbook on Quaternions?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Intro Physics Looking for an Introductory Physics Book without Flashy Presentation?
Replies
14
Views
5K
Classical The best introductory mechanics textbook
Replies
39
Views
7K
Other A question about strange claims in some textbooks
Replies
19
Views
4K
Foundations High school and undergraduate math textbooks for refreshing my skills
Replies
18
Views
4K
Quantum Math Textbooks to Read Before Starting QFT
Replies
9
Views
4K
Calculus Should I read Spivak's Calculus as an undergrad in theoretical physics?
Replies
2
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top