moejoe15
- 8
- 0
D H said:Why is he denigrating reptiles so? They're spam. Sliced, processed alien meat.
Now you're insulting Spam.
D H said:Why is he denigrating reptiles so? They're spam. Sliced, processed alien meat.
russ_watters said:...also, you misinterpreted the poll results: since there were a lot of republicans to choose from, their vote got split.
You might want to add Santorum while you're at it.Evo said:Should I update the poll to those that are actually running?
That was my thought.Jimmy Snyder said:You might want to add Santorum while you're at it.
That wouldn't allow you to vote again, it will still register that you've voted. The only changes are the addition of Santorm and Huntsman, so unless you want to change your vote to them, it doesn't matter.moejoe15 said:We can't vote again? So this is messed up. How about clearing the votes and let everyone vote again.
Evo said:The latest NH poll shows Huntsman at 13%, so I threw him in.
mathwonk said:let me be less precise russ, i find it surprising that > 0 votes were cast for palin and bachmann on a scientific site.
Evo said:That wouldn't allow you to vote again, it will still register that you've voted. The only changes are the addition of Santorm and Huntsman, so unless you want to change your vote to them, it doesn't matter.
It won't let me reset it, so why not start a new thread Poll 2?moejoe15 said:That's what I mean, no one who already voted can add a vote for either of them so what good is adding their names. While I wouldn't give Santorum a job at Mickey D's, I wouldn't be heading for the hills if it was Huntsman. I would probably give him a vote.
Because there were multiple Republicans to choose from, not everyone who chose republican chose all republicans. That doesn't necessarily mean they wouldn't prefer one republican they didn't choose over Obama who they also didn't choose.moejoe15 said:How do you figure the vote got split when you can choose as many as you want?
It says I voted for Romney. The vote count is correct because I moved the count to match the candidate, but as you move names, the poll still shows the original *position* the person you voted for was in. The poll software is sucky.russ_watters said:Er...so now the poll says I voted for Paul, which I certainly did not.
russ_watters said:Er...so now the poll says I voted for Paul, which I certainly did not.
Evo said:It says I voted for Romney. The vote count is correct because I moved the count to match the candidate, but as you move names, the poll still shows the original *position* the person you voted for was in. The poll software is sucky.