The 41 second clock failure syndrome

  • Thread starter Thread starter anorlunda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Failure
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a recurring failure in inexpensive wall clocks, specifically getting stuck at the 41-second mark. Users report that multiple clocks exhibit this issue, suggesting a potential common manufacturing flaw, possibly related to the gears or battery performance. Experiments indicate that tilting the clock can temporarily resolve the sticking issue, pointing to gravity's role and possible gear imperfections. The conversation also touches on the use of different battery types and the impact of aging batteries on clock performance. Ultimately, the consensus is that while weak batteries may contribute, the primary cause appears to be manufacturing defects in the clock mechanisms.
  • #61
I can accept that the answer may approach 42 asymptotically, and I can understand why in a digital system, it may fall short given insufficient observation time, but where is zero?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #62
Baluncore said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusee_(horology) can accept that the answer may approach 42 asymptotically, and I can understand why in a digital system, it may fall short given insufficient observation time, but where is zero?
It's not really relevant that the clock uses a digital system to provide pulses to to drive a motor. The same thing could happen with a mechanical clock with a spring. I would pursue this further but I don't have the time.
Or is this whole thread just a wind up?
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #63
According to some sources, the meaning of 42 is rooted in the ASCII character set where 42 represents the code point for ‘*’ the asterisk which is used to reference every file or everything.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #64
In any event, it's fun to separate the sf literate from illiterate using 42.
 
  • #65
anorlunda said:
In any event, it's fun to separate the sf literate from illiterate using 42.

Or, the musically literate:

hutchphd said:
On a slightly less technical plane, and as a person of some time on-planet, I offer a more worrisome supernatural explanation from a favored musician:



I was fortunate to see Doc Watson play a few times, just amazing. I'm not a guitar player but even I can hear how clear each note is.

The only other bit I have to add is this, normally seen in barber shops.

barber_shop_clock.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and hutchphd
  • #66
anorlunda said:
In any event, it's fun to separate the sf literate from illiterate using 42.
I worked it out when I was a young lad:

6 x 9 does equal 42 ... In Base 13.
 
  • Wow
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #67
gmax137 said:
I was fortunate to see Doc Watson play a few times, just amazing.
I saw him play in the early 70's with his son Merle (at Antioch College in Ohio). What an extraordinary man.
 
  • #68
jedishrfu said:
42 represents the code point for ‘*’
If he'd used 2A then everyone would have got it!
 
  • #69
Literati devotees of Kurt Vonnegut will recognize the "*" as Fundamental
1669116667612.png
 
  • #70
DaveC426913 said:
6 x 9 does equal 42 ... In Base 13.
For what it's worth, 42 days is exactly 10! seconds. (Ten factorial.)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes hutchphd, anorlunda, jedishrfu and 1 other person
  • #71
So I used simple factoring to show that 42 days has 10! seconds

42 days in seconds is 42 . 24 . 36 . 100: ##2^8 . 3^4 . 5^2 . 7##

10! is 10 . 9 . 8 . 7 . 6 . 5 . 4 . 3 . 2 . 1 which is ##2^8 . 3^4 . 5^2 . 7##

How did you come to learn this arcane factoid?
 
  • #72
jedishrfu said:
42 days in seconds is 42 . 24 . 36 . 100: ##2^8 . 3^4 . 5^2 . 7##
OK, I get this, but...
jedishrfu said:
10! is 10 . 9 . 8 . 7 . 6 . 5 . 4 . 3 . 2 . 1 which is ##2^8 . 3^4 . 5^2 . 7##
How do you get this? That doesn't seem to be a shortcut or anything: 256.81.25.7
 
  • #73
jedishrfu said:
How did you come to learn this arcane factoid?
I can't remember when I first saw this, but it stuck in my mind as another candidate for the Ultimate Question, "What is the smallest integer number of days that is an exact factorial number of seconds?"

$$\begin{align*}
&\frac
{42 \times 24 \times 60 \times 60}
{10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7 \times 6 \times 5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1} \\
&= \frac{60}{10} \times \frac{1}{9} \times \frac{24}{8} \times \frac{42}{7 \times 6} \times \frac{60}{5 \times 4} \times \frac{1}{3 \times 2} \\
&= 6 \times \left( \frac{1}{9} \times 3 \times 1 \times 3 \right) \times \frac{1}{6} \\
&= 1
\end{align*}$$
 
  • #74
DaveC426913 said:
OK, I get this, but...

How do you get this? That doesn't seem to be a shortcut or anything: 256.81.25.7
I just prime factored the 10! Factors and counted up the 2s 3s 5s and 7s

2.5.3.3.2.2.2.7.2.3.5.2.2.3.2.1

You can think there are 5 even factors in 10! Hence five 2s But 8 gives you two more and 4 one more for a total of 8 2s or ##2^8## …
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #75
I've not got an answer to your 41 second problem but it may be not dissimilar to the Thursday effect for grandfather clocks. This causes longcase clocks to stop on Thursdays* i.e. when the pendulum is the same length as the (hanging) weights causing a transfer of energy to the (swinging) weights if there is the slightest tendency for the clock to sway.
The standard cure is to put a match stick under the appropriate corner of the clock for which the clockmaker (or repairer) will charge five guineas.
*This, of course, is based on the normal rules of the household i.e. that the clock is wound up on a Sunday evening.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Rive, Baluncore, anorlunda and 1 other person
  • #76
So there's your answer @anorlunda : tilt your clock:

1671736462891.png
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and anorlunda
  • #77
DaveC426913 said:
So there's your answer @anorlunda : tilt your clock:
That'll be five guineas please... :smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes dlgoff, Rive, anorlunda and 1 other person
  • #78
my experience (about 30 years) with many clocks is that the stuck occurred at 44 seconds when the effort from 44 to 45 requires more energy and tend to increase. The effort from 45 to 46 tends to use the same energy but it moves to decreasing power needs. If the clock is able to move from 44 it is not guaranteed to achieve 45, but if it is able to move from 45, for sure it will reach a 46 and it will be able to 1 more clockwise round. However, and influencing parameter could be the threshold move of the second clock hand. I had a very 'smooth like' hand which stopped at 47 seconds in the past.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K