The age-old shut down vs hibernate debate

  • Thread starter Pleonasm
  • Start date
In summary: It's like turning off a light switch. In summary, there is less stress on a system going from luke to warm, as opposed to cold to luke warm.
  • #36
Klystron said:
Interesting and quantifiable point. Begs the question: should chargeable devices be left plugged in?
.

It stops charging after 100% so it doesn't matter, if 100% charge is your goal.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #37
Pleonasm said:
https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-genius-turn-off-your-phone-for-better-battery-life/

Why would battery longevity imrpove from nightly shutdowns? I lose 2% from just starting it up,... about the same that procentage lost over night if the phone is on airplane mode.

https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong_lithium_based_batteries said:
Lithium-ion suffers from stress when exposed to heat, so does keeping a cell at a high charge voltage. A battery dwelling above 30°C (86°F) is considered elevated temperature and for most Li-ion a voltage above 4.10V/cell is deemed as high voltage. Exposing the battery to high temperature and dwelling in a full state-of-charge for an extended time can be more stressful than cycling. Table 3 demonstrates capacity loss as a function of temperature and SoC.
image.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    25.1 KB · Views: 380
  • Like
Likes elusiveshame, russ_watters and Klystron
  • #38
anorlunda said:
I searched for a study comparing PCs which stay on always with those that power off every night. I couldn't find one. If there was such a study, it could provide the definitive answer.

There are now publicity campaigns trying to convince people to stop wasting electricity (and being more green) by powering down all devices that draw standby power overnight. That is more than PCs, entertainment center boxes are a major culprit. There are also EU and US regulations mandating reduced standby power consumption.

The situation today is much better than in 2000, yet we still see public estimates such as below. I am skeptical of that 10% number, but I have no hard data. Nevertheless, it is foreseeable that some lawmaker will one day forbid leaving personal computers on 24x7, and perhaps forbidding standby mode for all consumer devices.

I don't have the time to find it, but I think Google or someone had some interesting data.

My understanding of the question is more do you let it run 24/7 or shut down at night, google or facebook, one of them, used domestic computers for their server farms so had interesting data on MTBF for things like spinning drives, and I think the standard theory was less power cycles = more run time, but based on the statistical data they measured (from 1000's of PC's and their component failure rates) they didn't notice any effect (between power off at night and run 24/7).

Re original question re shut down vs hibernate, I doubt there is a lot of difference, both are basically "off", but if looking at keep running 24/7 vs some low power state (hybernate/shutdown/sleep) the thought was the life saved due to the "off" period would be less than the wear a power cycle/thermal cycle added, therefore its better to not turn it off.

Even though the data says there was not statistical diff between off at each night and run 24/7, I just feel better if my spin drives are running at a constant temp constant speed.

Note that from a greeny perspective, we heat the house at least half the year so at that point its parasitic heating that reduces the load on the furnace :P
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda and Klystron
  • #39
russ_watters said:
As far as I know, solid state devices such as computers and even more so cell phones do not "age" in an appreciable way, and so the "debate" is moot: it does not affect the lifespan noticeably, whether you shut down your computer/phone or let it go to sleep.

This is not correct. See below.
https://semiengineering.com/transistor-aging-intensifies-10nm/

When hibernating a SOC has more of its die area biased [*] which means the time to dioxide breakdown or NBTI failure could be reduced, in theory, but the engineers should've assumed the part was biased 100% of the time in the lifetime model so whether or not the part is in shutdown it should still meet the stated lifetime goal making the point moot.

* Part of the die area (for example, the real-time clock circuit) is always biased. Unless the battery is physically disconnected of course.
 
  • #40
Just two small points.
  • maybe worth to look up 'BGA reball' and the mentioned failure reasons on the pages coming up as result. Temperature change does have an effect.
  • worth checking the temperature profiles of the most frequently affected components (CPU and GPU). Usually both has more changes during load<>idle than idle<>OFF. Loads like games are especially bad.
 

Similar threads

Replies
152
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
78
Views
10K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top