The Arc of Space Curvature: Large and Small

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of space curvature in relation to mass and distance, exploring when the curvature is considered large or small. Participants examine the implications of mass density, the distinction between space and spacetime curvature, and the mathematical frameworks involved in understanding curvature in general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that large masses lead to a large space curvature while small masses lead to a small curvature, but the definition of "large/small arc" is questioned.
  • Others argue that the distance from the mass significantly affects the curvature, suggesting that proximity alters the curvature experienced.
  • A participant mentions that spacetime curvature is distinct from space curvature, indicating that the relationship between mass-energy distribution and curvature is complex and not solely dependent on mass density.
  • There is a suggestion that the curvature could be influenced by the distribution of mass, as in the case of a ton of hydrogen gas versus a ton of lead.
  • Some participants inquire about formulas for calculating space-time curvature, with references to the Riemann curvature tensor and specific metrics like the Schwarzschild metric.
  • Discussions arise regarding the coordinate dependence of spatial curvature and the necessity of defining constant time surfaces for meaningful analysis.
  • Participants highlight that multiple measures of curvature exist, such as Ricci and Riemann curvature, and that there is no consensus on a singular definition of gravitational curvature.
  • Some contributions emphasize the geometric relations between extrinsic and intrinsic curvatures and the implications of foliation in spacetime.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of space curvature versus spacetime curvature, with no consensus reached on the nature of curvature or the conditions under which it is considered large or small.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in the definitions used for curvature, the dependence on coordinate systems, and the unresolved complexities in relating mass-energy distributions to curvature measures.

  • #31
pervect said:
There's a short bit in MTW - it doesn't give the components names, but it breaks them down in the same way. See exercise 14.14 on pg 360. The 3x3 submatrixes are called E,F, and H
Thank you very much for looking that up pervect. I'll take a look at it as soon as I can. Cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K