The behaviour of a vacuum without the influence of air pressure?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on an experiment involving two flasks, A and B, where Flask A contains a vacuum and Flask B is filled with mercury, both situated within a larger vacuum flask C. When a valve is opened between the two flasks, the consensus is that liquid mercury does not flow into Flask A due to the pressure differential created by gravity and the vapor pressure of mercury. Instead, equilibrium is reached through mercury vapor, suggesting that the vacuum in Flask A does not exert a force strong enough to draw liquid mercury from Flask B.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vacuum physics
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics and pressure differentials
  • Familiarity with vapor pressure concepts
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of vapor pressure and its effects on liquid behavior
  • Study fluid dynamics related to pressure differentials in closed systems
  • Explore experiments involving vacuums and liquid interactions
  • Investigate thermodynamic principles governing phase changes and equilibrium
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, researchers in fluid dynamics, and anyone interested in the principles of vacuums and their effects on liquid behavior.

juniorcarty
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am curious to know if anyone knows if the following experiment has ever been conducted? If not, can anyone theorise what the result may be? 2 flasks A,B are of equal size. Flask A contains a vacuum. Flask B is entirely full of mercury, with no air present. To ensure that the effect of external air pressure has no influence on the experiment,both flasks A and B are contained within a third larger flask C, which itself contains a vacuum.(Apart from the presence of the flasks within obviously). A valve is opened between flasks A and B. Does the mercury in B flow into A? If so, it can be assumed that the consequential vacuum(ous) space so created in flask B, will necessarily always be 'harder' than that contained in flask A, therefore preventing the possibility that the mercury levels in both flasks will equalise. Alternatively, does the mercury simply remain in flask B? If so, this contradicts the statement that 'nature abhors a vacuum, does it not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

I think you can understand the situation better if you do not think of the vacuum as a thing. When flask A is open, mercury vapours will start floating around and some will end up in flask B. Equilibrium should be reached when the vapour pressure of mercury is the same in both flasks. But I don't see why there would be any flow of liquid mercury.
 
Assuming that the flasks are level with each other then there is a tiny pressure differential. The pressure of the mercury vapor at the bottom of the empty flask is slightly higher than it is at the top of the full flask. This is due to gravity.

If the vapor at the top of the full flask is in equilibrium with the liquid at the top of the full flask and if the vapor at the bottom of the empty flask is at a higher pressure than that then one would expect condensation at the bottom of the empty flask.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K