The commercial toy, Levitron, can achieve stable magnetic levitation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stability of magnetic levitation in the commercial toy Levitron, particularly focusing on the implications of Earnshaw's theorem and the possibility of achieving stable levitation with a horizontal spinning axis. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications regarding magnetic configurations and gyroscopic stabilization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the Levitron achieves stable magnetic levitation due to gyroscopic stabilization and axis precession, specifically with a vertical spinning axis.
  • Another participant questions whether a horizontally rotating Levitron could achieve levitation, suggesting that the alternating magnetic poles would lead to cancellation of forces, resulting in failure to levitate.
  • A third participant agrees that the magnetic configuration of the Levitron does not support horizontal rotation and inquires if it can be generalized that no magnetic configuration would allow stable levitation in this orientation.
  • One participant proposes that a generalization could be made, asserting that stable levitation requires a constant vertical force, implying the need for vertical stability in both the base and the levitating object.
  • Another participant introduces a speculative idea that if both the levitator and the base revolved at the same rate with like poles facing each other, it might allow for stable levitation, though they acknowledge the practical challenges of implementation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of horizontal magnetic levitation, with some agreeing on the limitations posed by magnetic configurations while others propose speculative scenarios. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the generalization of stable levitation conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference Earnshaw's theorem and its implications but do not provide a detailed exploration of its assumptions or limitations. The discussion includes speculative ideas that are not fully developed or tested.

Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
The commercial toy, Levitron, can achieve stable magnetic levitation due to gyroscopic stabilization and axis precesion. The Levitron toy sold in market has a vertical spinning axis, and so far I have not found a variation with horizontal axis.

Is it allowed in Earnshaw's theorem, for a magnetic system to have stable levitation, just by rotation alone, in a horizontal spinning axis?

Thanks in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Not familiar with Earnshaw's Theorem (will look it up later), but a horizontally rotating levitron would have its positive and negative polls alternately pointing toward the magnet beneath. This would not levitate, asthe equall times of being attracted and repelled by the base would cancel out, and gravity would assert itself.
 


True, the magnetic configuration of Levitron doesn't allow it to rotate on horizontal axis. I did try other magnetic configuration but it doesn't work out as well.

However, can we generalize, that for ANY magnetic configuration, the system wouldn't be able to levitate stably and rotating on horizontal axis?
 


I believe it is a fair generalization. The nature of magnetic levitation requires a vertical force that holds constant. That would seem to dictate the need for both the base and the levitating object to remain vertically stable. I, at least, can think of no way around that (although my imagination is admittedly quite limited).
 


OK, a few minutes of thinking did yield a tantalizing possibility. If both the levitator and the base were revoling at the same rate, so that like poles always faced one another, that might work. Ity would be a nightmare to try to impliment, though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K