How High Must You Be to See 1° of Earth's Curvature?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FelixLudi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Earth
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the height required to observe 1° of Earth's curvature. Participants explore geometric and trigonometric approaches to this problem, considering the Earth as a perfect sphere and discussing the implications of various assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a method using the circumference of the Earth to calculate the distance corresponding to 1° of curvature, leading to a triangle model for height calculation.
  • Another participant questions the initial triangle setup, suggesting that a triangle involving the center of the Earth might be more appropriate for this calculation.
  • Several participants discuss the use of trigonometric functions, particularly the cosine function, to relate the angles and sides of the triangle formed by the observer's height and the curvature of the Earth.
  • There is a suggestion to use Pythagorean theorem in conjunction with trigonometric identities to find the necessary height, although some express uncertainty about how to incorporate angles into the calculations.
  • One participant notes that for small angles, approximations can simplify the calculations, while others seek clarification on how to derive the height from the established relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to calculate the height needed to see 1° of curvature. Multiple approaches and interpretations of the geometry involved are presented, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the assumptions made about the Earth's shape and the accuracy of the circumference value used in calculations. There are also unresolved questions about the application of trigonometric functions in the context of the proposed triangle models.

FelixLudi
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
(i.e the height you need to be at to look forward)
(This isn't in physics subforum because it's more of a geometry question, this is NOT a homework question and it's more of a random thought)

Basically, I've been thinking what height would you have to be at, to see 1° of Earth's curvature.
So this is my math;

Circumference of Earth = 40.075 km ~ 40 000 km
x = 40 000 km

Assuming that Earth is a perfect sphere, and that in 2D it's a perfect circle it's angle would be 360°.

Over of Earth's curvature, the distance (d = x/360°)
d = 40000 km / 360°
d = 111,11* km

(In my school we put an asterisk at the end to define a number without end (e.g 2/3 = 0.66*))

Over that 1° of curvature, I assumed a shape of a triangle where the ground points are defined as dots A and B where the dot A has almost a sharp angle (90°) and the dot B has an angle of .
In that triangle the cathetus between A and B is equal to d = 111,11* km, and the dot C which is elevated above dot A has the other cathetus of undefined height a, while the hypotenuse is c and is directly opposite of the dot A. In this triangle the hypotenuse and the cathetus d are near the same length, and I can not go further than this to calculate the height a needed to look over from dot A to dot B over the Earth's curvature (angle) of . How do I adjust the equation of Pythagoras' theorem to this triangle?

Anyone that can help me?
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
FelixLudi said:
(In my school we put an asterisk at the end to define a number without end (e.g 2/3 = 0.66*))
How would you distinguish 5/11 = 0.454545... from 0.4+5/90 = 0.455555...?
Anyway, it is better to round to useful values, if you need numerical values. The circumference is not exactly 40,000 km.
FelixLudi said:
Over that 1° of curvature, I assumed a shape of a triangle where the ground points are defined as dots A and B where the dot A has almost a sharp angle (90°) and the dot B has an angle of .
Where are A and B? As seen from the surface, the other surface point is not 1 degree below the horizontal.

You probably want to consider a triangle that involves the center of Earth.
 
mfb said:
How would you distinguish 5/11 = 0.454545... from 0.4+5/90 = 0.455555...?
Technically we put asterisks above the said number, if it were 0.4545 we would put asterisks above 4 and 5 (0.4*5* where the asterisks are actually above said numbers). And if it were 0.4555 we would just put one asterisk on the 5.
Kinda hard to explain but I assume you get the point.

mfb said:
Where are A and B? As seen from the surface, the other surface point is not 1 degree below the horizontal.
Assuming to the calculation, from point A to point B there should be approximately 111.11 km (distance d) between them, including 1° of curvature and assuming the Earth is a perfect sphere, and that it's circumference is exactly 40 000 km.

mfb said:
You probably want to consider a triangle that involves the center of Earth.
What did you mean by that?
A triangle that starts in the center of the Earth, in which point it has a 1° angle and that extends to the surface?
Seems plausible, but I'm looking for the height needed to look over 1° of curvature of the Earth.
 
Last edited:
FelixLudi said:
Technically we put asterisks above the said number, if it were 0.4545 we would put asterisks above 4 and 5 (0.4*5* where the asterisks are actually above said numbers). And if it were 0.4555 we would just put one asterisk on the 5.
Kinda hard to explain but I assume you get the point.Assuming to the calculation, from point A to point B there should be approximately 111.11 km (distance d) between them, including 1° of curvature and assuming the Earth is a perfect sphere, and that it's circumference is exactly 40 000 km.What did you mean by that?
A triangle that starts in the center of the Earth, in which point it has a 1° angle and that extends to the surface?
Seems plausible, but I'm looking for the height needed to look over 1° of curvature of the Earth.

Something like this
CURVE.jpg

The green line is your sight line which just grazes the horizon from your position at the top of the red line. Just solve for the triangle for the desired angle between the two black lines and find the length of the red line from that.
 

Attachments

  • CURVE.jpg
    CURVE.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 1,190
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto and jim mcnamara
Janus said:
Something like this
View attachment 221535
The green line is your sight line which just grazes the horizon from your position at the top of the red line. Just solve for the triangle for the desired angle between the two black lines and find the length of the red line from that.

How would I get the length of the green line and how would I encorporate that into the given formula.
So far the only thing I can understand is that the black lines are equal to Earth's radius (r = 6 371 km).
The left black line is equal to r but the right line also has the red line, so it would be higher.
How do I solve for the desired angle, I doubt that Pythagoras' theorem would work for angles.
 
The tangent function will help here.
If you don't know that yet: The length of the green line is approximately 111 km, you can determine the length of the red line with Pythagoras alone using this approximation.
 
Yes but I do not know where to include the angle in the a2 + b2 = c2 formula.
 
FelixLudi said:
Yes but I do not know where to include the angle in the a2 + b2 = c2 formula.
You don't. You use trigonometry.
The triangle has three sides:
The hypotenuse (combined black and red line)
Adjacent ( the "black only" line)
And the opposite ( the green line).
Cos(A) = Adjacent/hypotenuse
Thus, using your calculator, find the cos of the angle you are interested in (A).
Divide the length of the adjacent side (equal to the radius of the Earth) by this.
This gives you the length of the hypotenuse. From which you can get the length of the red line.
 
Janus said:
You don't. You use trigonometry.
The triangle has three sides:
The hypotenuse (combined black and red line)
Adjacent ( the "black only" line)
And the opposite ( the green line).
Cos(A) = Adjacent/hypotenuse
Thus, using your calculator, find the cos of the angle you are interested in (A).
Divide the length of the adjacent side (equal to the radius of the Earth) by this.
This gives you the length of the hypotenuse. From which you can get the length of the red line.

I understand how I would use Cos there but the red line is included in the hypotenuse, and I need to calculate the red line using the hypotenuse (which includes it)?
Saying that the adjacent is b and the hypotenuse is c, in which c1 is the radius of the Earth (the black line in the hypotenuse) and c2 is the red line in the hypotenuse. (c = c1 + c2).
Therefore to calculate the Cos of A;
Cos(A) = b / c
Cos(A) = b / (c1 + c2)
Cos(A) = 6371 km / (6371 km + c2)

Or did I misunderstand?
 
  • #10
If you've already calculated A then you calculate the cosine of A by keying A into your calculator and hitting the cos key.
 
  • #11
FelixLudi said:
I understand how I would use Cos there but the red line is included in the hypotenuse, and I need to calculate the red line using the hypotenuse (which includes it)?
Saying that the adjacent is b and the hypotenuse is c, in which c1 is the radius of the Earth (the black line in the hypotenuse) and c2 is the red line in the hypotenuse. (c = c1 + c2).
Therefore to calculate the Cos of A;
Cos(A) = b / c
Cos(A) = b / (c1 + c2)
Cos(A) = 6371 km / (6371 km + c2)

Or did I misunderstand?
As alluded to by jbriggs444, Cos(A) is a known since you already know what A is (in this case 1°) Today, you just use a calculator, and in pre-calculator days you'd look it up on a trig table or use a slide rule.

Thus in the equation, you just rearrange until your one unknown is one side by itself.
c_2 = \frac{b}{\cos A}-c_1

and since c1= b
c_2 = \frac{b}{\cos A}-b

c_2 = b \left ( \frac{1}{\cos A} -1 \right )

Now if A is small, as it is here, and you don't need an exact answer you can get a close answer through the method aluded to by mfb in post #6

For small values of A, the Green line (a) is almost the same as the distance along the surface of the Earth between the hypotenuse (c) and the radial line b.
Thus this distance will be ~b (pi/180) in length if A = 1°
This gives us two sides of the triangle a and b, and we now can find the hypotenuse c, subtract b from it to get c1
For different values of A the arc length becomes ~ bA( pi/180)
And with a bit of algebra we can arrive at the equation:
c_2 = b \left ( \sqrt { \left ( \frac{A \pi}{180} \right) ^2 +1}-1 \right )

But as I said above, this only gives a reasonably close answer if A is small.

Here is the graph comparing the two methods for values of A from 1° to 45°
viewheight.png

The blue line is from the Trig solution and the red line from the Pythagorean theorem approximation.
 

Attachments

  • viewheight.png
    viewheight.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 747
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K