The electric field from its electric potential: semicircle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the electric field (E) from the electric potential (V) for a semicircular charge distribution. The original poster attempts to apply the relationship E = -grad(V) but encounters confusion regarding the constancy of V and its implications for calculating E.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of electric potential and question the assumption that V is constant. There are discussions about the implications of using a specific point versus a neighborhood for calculating gradients.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions made about the potential and its calculation. Some have suggested that the potential may not be constant at all points, indicating a productive exploration of the topic without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific values and constants, such as the charge density and the constant k, as well as a note about the potential being derived from a specific point rather than over an area. The discussion also touches on the need for a broader understanding of the potential in a two-dimensional context.

iochoa2016
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Strugling to get the E from its V at the centre of the semicircle.
Relevant Equations
V = k*lambda* pi
pi = 3.1415
lambda = charge density
k = 1 / (4*pi*eo)
According to theory I should be able to get the Electric Field (E) from its pOtential (V) by doing the grad (V) so

E = -grad(V), however, V is contant V = k*lambda* pi which results having E =0, but this is not right. What I am missing??
see figure below
e.png
The answer should be Ex = 2*k*lambda / r

This is how I calculate V:

dV = k * dQ/r = k*r*d(theta)*lambda / r
dV = k*lambda * d(theta)
Integrating from 0 to pi

V = k* lambda * pi.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you say that ##V## is constant ? All you bring forward is an expresssion for (I suppose?) ##V## at the point ##O## ...

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
k = constant, lambda = constant so V = constant, isn't it?
 
How did you 'calculate' this ##V## ?

##\ ##
 
This is how I calculate V:

dV = k * dQ/r = k*r*d(theta)*lambda / r
dV = k*lambda * d(theta)
Integrating from 0 to pi

V = k* lambda * pi.
 
iochoa2016 said:
k = constant, lambda = constant so V = constant, isn't it?
You are using the expression for the potential at a specific point, but grad is the derivative wrt position. What will be the potential at a nearby point?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
found this:
along an axis pointing out the paper passing through the "O",
V = K*lambda*pi * r /(sqrt(r^2+z^2)
 
iochoa2016 said:
found this:
along an axis pointing out the paper passing through the "O",
V = K*lambda*pi * r /(sqrt(r^2+z^2)
Okay, but you can find ##\vec E## at a point directly. To obtain ##\vec E## from ##-\nabla V##, you need to find ##V## in a neighbourhood of the point. This is very unlikely to be easier.
 
Yes, I think you are right. Just triying to use energy to work out the Field.

It was easy for the example below, but not so easy for the semicircle ring.

Screenshot 2022-02-01 225938.png
 
  • #10
iochoa2016 said:
Homework Statement:: Strugling to get the E from its V at the centre of the semicircle.
Relevant Equations:: V = k*lambda* pi
pi = 4.1516
lambda = charge density
k = 1 / (4*pi*eo)
Check your value of ##π## first unless of course you are from Indiana.:smile:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and iochoa2016
  • #11
Did the problem specifically say to use the potential or did it just ask you to derive the field?
 
  • #12
The gradient is essentially the partial derivatives, and to be able to calculate a partial derivative correctly you need to know the formula of the function in an interval ##(a,b)## and not just at a specific point (0 in this case) . You need to know the formula for the potential in a subarea of the circle in this case since we have a 2D case and not just at the central point of the circle (0,0).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K