The end of a ski jump(projectile motion)

  • Thread starter Thread starter babysnatcher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a ski jumper's projectile motion as they leave a ski track horizontally at a speed of 25.0 m/s and land on an inclined slope of 35.0 degrees. Participants are exploring the physical reasoning behind the landing point on the incline and questioning the uniqueness of the solution based on geometric principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand why there is only one landing point for the skier despite varying distances and angles. Questions arise about the nature of the resultant vector and its components, as well as the implications of changing the height of the snow on the landing distance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants expressing confusion about the problem's parameters and the geometric relationships involved. There are indications of differing interpretations regarding the variables at play, and some participants are seeking clarification on the reasoning behind the uniqueness of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of changing variables, such as the height of the snow, and how these affect the trajectory and landing point while maintaining the same angle. There is a focus on understanding the geometric constraints of the problem.

babysnatcher
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
a ski jumper leaves the ski track moving in the horizontal direction with a speed of 25.0 m/s. The landing incline below him falls off with a slope of 35.0 degrees. where does he land on the incline?

I already know how to use formulas to plug and chug to get an answer. I need to know why the answer is the only answer. what is the physical reasoning behind it because geometrically, the vector can be as long as it wants to be without changing that angle. What is the reasoning behind what the maximum magnitude the vector can have? how am i suppose to know this? is maximum magnitude the magnitude that is only before exceeding the magnitude that will force the skier into certain death? is it the snow that determines the limit? the ramp? what is it? i don't see it at all! we only get one angle so the triangle can be as big as it wants to be!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
babysnatcher said:
the vector can be as long as it wants to be without changing that angle. What is the reasoning behind what the maximum magnitude the vector can have?

Which vector?
 
Borek said:
Which vector?

the Resultant vector. draw the picture. omg xD

actually, they are all freaking varibles xD. all 3 of them.
 
Last edited:
Still no idea what you are talking about. To be honest, from your description I am not convinced you know how to solve the problem. Geometrically for this particular set of data there is only one solution, period.
 
Borek said:
Still no idea what you are talking about. To be honest, from your description I am not convinced you know how to solve the problem. Geometrically for this particular set of data there is only one solution, period.


prove it.
 
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the question, but if a skier goes off a jump with a known velocity, then their path through space is determined. Isn't it clear that he can only land in one particular spot on the ramp?
 
Millacol88 said:
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the question, but if a skier goes off a jump with a known velocity, then their path through space is determined. Isn't it clear that he can only land in one particular spot on the ramp?

yeah, i guess so. but the resultant vector, and the components of the resultant vector are variables.

so how do i find the one and only answer when the distance can be anything?

like, i can say he lands 6.5 m away. i can also say he lands 7m away. which one is it? it varies with the height of the snow. how am i suppose to only get exactly one precise finite answer when the 3 sides of the triangle are variables?

i can take off as much snow as i want or add as much snow as i want, which will change the vertical and horizontal distance while keeping the angle the same at all times. you can't get a side with just geometry xD. can't complete a triangle with just one given angle.
 
Whoops.
 
Take a look here:

attachment.php?attachmentid=59996&stc=1&d=1372624054.png


There is only one point where the skier can land.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-3.png
    Untitled-3.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 1,255
  • #10
aha, tangent. ok, I am convinced.
 
  • #11
babysnatcher said:
aha, tangent. ok, I am convinced.

wait nvm, it can still be any ratio of x and y :(
 
  • #12
Millacol88 said:
Whoops.

lol, i saw that xD. you solve it the same way the textbook does but i still don't get it. i need to know that given that angle, it can only be at that spot whether the heights change.
 
  • #13
babysnatcher said:
it can only be at that spot whether the heights change.

Heights of what?

Please try to analyze the drawing I posted. Vector shows initial velocity if the skier. After the jump he follows the thin line and lands on the slope. Your task is to find where the trajectory intersects the slope.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K