The Faraday disc (unipolar generator) and Lenz' law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Lenz' Law to a rotating Faraday disc in a perpendicular magnetic field. Participants clarify that as the disc rotates counter-clockwise, an induced EMF generates a positive charge at the edge and a negative charge at the center. This charge separation leads to a clockwise induced current along the boundary of the circular sector, opposing the increase in magnetic flux, consistent with Faraday's Law. The analysis draws parallels to the motional EMF of a conductive bar sliding on rails in a magnetic field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lenz' Law and its implications in electromagnetic induction.
  • Familiarity with Faraday's Law of electromagnetic induction.
  • Knowledge of the right-hand rule for determining the direction of induced current.
  • Basic concepts of magnetic flux and its relation to rotating systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of Faraday's Law in relation to rotating systems.
  • Explore the concept of motional EMF in conductive materials, particularly in sliding bars.
  • Investigate the effects of varying magnetic fields on induced currents in conductive loops.
  • Learn about applications of Lenz' Law in real-world electromagnetic devices.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetic induction and their applications in devices like generators and motors.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

I can't seem to understand how to apply Lenz' law to a disc rotating in a magnetic field that is perpendicular to the discs plane (see first page on PDF):

http://www.pa.uky.edu/~latimer/phy232s08/lectures/phy232l31_4.pdf

I can see that using the right-hand rule, positive charge will build up on the edge and negative at the center. So an EMF will run from the outer edge to the center, but I can't seem to relate this to Lenz' law. The change in magnetic flux will just get larger because of the induced EMF, and not opposed?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
I can see that using the right-hand rule, positive charge will build up on the edge and negative at the center. So an EMF will run from the outer edge to the center, but I can't seem to relate this to Lenz' law. The change in magnetic flux will just get larger because of the induced EMF, and not opposed?

If you've seen the analysis for "motional EMF" that is done for a conductive bar sliding on conductive rails in a uniform perpendicular magnetic field, you'll find this explanation is analogous.

For the rotating disc, imagine a specific radial line. Let's picture things so that you are facing one side of the disc with the magnetic field coming toward you, and the disc is rotating counter-clockwise. The imaginary radial line will be sweeping out a sector of a circle with area
(1/2)·(r^2)·(theta), where the angle theta is the angle through which the disc has rotated, starting from the moment you choose to be t = 0. You would use this to work out the rate of flux change for Faraday's Law, etc.

Now think of the boundary of this circular sector (shaped like a wedge). The amount of magnetic flux toward you is increasing in time. Using Lenz' "Law", we would argue that induced current must flow clockwise along the boundary of the sector so that magnetic flux away from you would be generated, in order to oppose the change in flux through the imaginary sector. On the side of the boundary where our imaginary radial line is, that induced current would flow from the center of the disc to the edge. So we find the charge separation described, as long as the disc keeps rotating.

This is consistent with the behavior expected by applying the magnetic force equation. A positive "charge carrier" is moving instantaneously on a tangent in the counter-clockwise direction in our view, with the magnetic field coming towards us. The cross product v x B then points radially away from the center of the disc.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for replying. A very precise description - good job!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
801
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K