The Feeling of Accelerated Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the sensation of accelerated motion and its scientific explanations, particularly referencing Mach's principle and Newton's bucket problem. Participants explore how physical forces, such as inertia and compression, contribute to the perception of acceleration, even in the absence of external reference frames. The conversation highlights that while inertia is a fundamental aspect of motion, the reasons behind our perception of acceleration remain complex and are linked to deeper theories in physics. It is noted that humans can sense forces acting upon them, which distinguishes acceleration from inertial motion. Overall, the dialogue reflects an ongoing inquiry into the nature of motion and perception in modern science.
nealh149
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
I've read some theories (for example Mach's principle of distant stars being the basis) of why we feel accelerated motion. What are modern sciences thoughts on this?

Couldn't it simply be collisions of particles against nerves just like the seat of a car pushes up against you in an accelerating car?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah.

I'm kind of curious about these "theories". Do the proponents of them feel that why we feel what we do is an unanswered question?
 
Yeah, that sounds like a sort of strange question. The various parts of our bodies don't have the same inertia, so they interact differently under acceleration.
 
I guess the question is why isn't acceleration relative motion, what makes it distinguishable between reference frames.
 
Maybe it's just the beer, but that last post of yours just made no sense whatsoever to me. :confused:
 
No, it's not the beer, because I'm drinking wine at the moment (in moderation of course). The OP is going to Cornell next year, which may explain the question... J/K :biggrin:
 
Well, I'm on the last of my beer, but I've still got a couple of W's Corona left, and a dozen ounces or so of tequila. Maybe by the time they're gone, I can interpret that question.
 
Sorry guys, let me try to rephrase this. I don't know if you ever heard Newton's Bucket problem, but here it goes:

If you had a water filled bucket and spin it, the water will become concave and push up against the sides of it. If you somehow suspended this bucket in empty space (a theoretical space where no other matter exists) would it still be concave. In other words, the bucket wouldn't have any external cues to measure it's rotation against, but could it still "feel" it internally?
 
Yes, because the bucket and the water have inertia. Inertia is independent of gravitational field.

Zz.
 
  • #10
Accelerated motion can only occur as a result of a force. We feel that force.

If you are way out in outer space such that you have no reference frame to give you clues, you can still tell if there is a force acting upon you. The corollary is that if you are not experiencing a force, you are not accelerating, you are in a state of inertial motion.

The bucket knows if it is experiencing a force; it is experiencing the centripetal force of the rope pulling it out of its straight-line inertial motion.
 
  • #11
Humans feel the force due to compression at the point of contact, and fluid pressure from accelerated blood.
 
  • #12
The OP appears to be asking about Mach's Principle, which attempts to explain why inertia exists and which is embodied in the mathematics of General Relativity. So answering that the reason we feel acceleration because of inertia is taking a step backward.
 
Back
Top