The force of 9.8 Newtons. torque equated to watts

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and calculations related to a hydro gravity generator that utilizes buoyancy and compressed air to generate electrical power. Participants explore the mechanics of the proposed system, including the relationship between buoyancy, air release, and power output, while addressing concerns about efficiency and the principles of energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to determine how much air needs to be released to achieve 800 watts of power from a hydro gravity generator.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of air in a hydro generator context and expresses confusion about the setup.
  • A participant describes a mechanism involving compressed air rising in water to turn a cog connected to a generator, asking for calculations related to force and power.
  • Concerns are raised about the efficiency of using compressed air in this setup, with a suggestion that it may not be a practical approach to energy generation.
  • One participant likens the proposed system to a perpetual motion machine, highlighting issues with energy conservation and the variable nature of buoyant force.
  • Another participant clarifies that the compressor is powered by renewable sources, such as wind and solar, and questions the feasibility of using buoyancy to power a generator.
  • Calculations are suggested regarding buoyancy force, ascent rate, and the necessary volume of air displacement to achieve the desired power output.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and efficiency of the proposed hydro gravity generator, with some questioning its feasibility and others defending its potential under specific conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness of the system and the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on various factors such as depth, buoyancy force, and ascent rate, which complicate the calculations and assumptions made about the system's performance.

thesleeper000
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Im makeing a hydro gravity genoratetor I need to no how much air to release to give 800w
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
thesleeper000 said:
Im makeing a hydro gravity genoratetor I need to no how much air to release to give 800w

Welcome to the PF.

Since it's a hydro generator, why are you asking about air? Not understanding the question so far...
 
the air is conpressed down 30 feet of pipe in water released into a bag connected to a bike chain the air rises in the water turning a cogg connected to a genorator.
How much air do i need to release to achive 800w. Or how many kg of force/air to achive 1w of power
 
thesleeper000 said:
the air is conpressed down 30 feet of pipe in water released into a bag connected to a bike chain the air rises in the water turning a cogg connected to a genorator.
How much air do i need to release to achive 800w. Or how many kg of force/air to achive 1w of power

That's not how hydro generators work...
 
I no
This is a generator that uses water and gravity .What would you call It ?
Do you no the answer or not ?
 
thesleeper000 said:
I no
This is a generator that uses water and gravity .What would you call It ?
Do you no the answer or not ?

I do know what a hydroelectric generator is. You are talking about using pumped air for something, so that would be called something different. It also sounds very inefficient. Standard hydroelectric power generation is very efficient (~90%):

www.usbr.gov/power/edu/pamphlet.pdf

Why would you want to have to power an air pump to try to tap power out of your arrangement?
 
This looks a lot to me like a buoyancy-based perpetual motion machine:

Step 1: Air compressor inflates a bag underwater.
Step 2: Bag rises, pulling a cable or chain, which turns an electric generator, which powers the air compressor and produces excess energy.
Step 3: Balloon reaches the surface, deflates, and sinks. Go to Step 1.

Is this what you are trying to do, thesleeper? If so, it is not possible, as it clearly violates conservation of energy.

However, the power calculation: power is buoyant force times the ascent rate of the bag. The problems are:
1. Buoyant force is variable, since the bag expands as it rises.
2. Ascent rate is difficult, since it depends on the drag of the water and is probably going to want to be a pre-selected value to give you constant RPM in your generator.

Figure for a rough guess, you'll want the bag to rise at most 1 m/s, so you'll need 800N of buoyancy, which based on water's weight density requires .08 cubic meters of displacement. Pressure is determined by starting depth.

And if this is about perpetual motion, we'll probably need to lock the thread...
 
Last edited:
Hi Russ
This is not a perpetual motion machine .
The compresser is powered by a wind turbine and sola panel.
Charging a 12 v battery .
The bouyancy power is an alternative when no wind or sola.
In theory can bouyancy force run a asinchronised generator to power a microwave 800w if so how much air needs to be released at 10m to achive 800w.
Or should I work backwards shaft torque is x bouyancy force is y ascent rate is z start depth 10m so y + z = x
 
thesleeper000 said:
how much air needs to be released at 10m to achive 800w.
.08 cubic meters, at any depth. But it'll need to be deep in order to give you more than a few seconds of power.

This is not a great way to store energy.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K