The geometric shape of parametric equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on understanding the geometric representation of parametric equations in three-dimensional space. Specifically, the equations x=t, y=2t, z=3t and x=t+2, y=t, z=t are analyzed. It is established that if all three equations are linear, the resulting shape is a straight line. Participants suggest substituting values for t and solving for one variable in terms of another to visualize the geometric implications effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts
  • Basic knowledge of three-dimensional geometry
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the visualization of parametric equations using graphing software like GeoGebra
  • Learn about the implications of linear transformations in 3D space
  • Investigate more complex parametric equations and their geometric representations
  • Study the relationship between parametric equations and vector functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and geometry, as well as anyone interested in visualizing and interpreting parametric equations in three-dimensional space.

Kubilay Yazoglu
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I have another question mark buzzing inside my head.

After the elimination steps of a matrix, I'm having some problems about imagining in 3D.

For example, x=t , y=2t, z=3t what it shows us?

Or, x=t+2, y=t,,z=t ?
Or another examples you can think of. ( Complicated ones of course)

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plug in t=0, t=1, t=2 and see what you get, that should help.
If possible, you can also solve one of the equations for t and plug it into the other two equations then you get y(x), z(x) or similar.

If all three equations are linear, the result is always a straight line.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K