The Indiscrete Topology is Pseudometrizable ... Willard, Example 3.2(d)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of pseudometrizability in the context of the trivial topology as presented in Stephen Willard's "General Topology." Example 3.2(d) illustrates that the topology generated by the trivial pseudometric on a set X consists solely of the empty set and the universal set. Participants clarify that under this topology, no singleton sets are closed, contrasting it with the discrete topology where one-point sets are both open and closed. The confusion primarily arises from the relationship between Example 3.2(d) and Example 2.7(e), specifically regarding the nature of closed sets in the indiscrete topology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic topology concepts, including open and closed sets.
  • Familiarity with pseudometrics and their properties.
  • Knowledge of the discrete topology and its characteristics.
  • Ability to interpret examples from topology literature, specifically from Willard's "General Topology."
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of pseudometrics in detail, focusing on trivial pseudometrics.
  • Examine the differences between the indiscrete topology and the discrete topology.
  • Review Example 2.7(e) in Willard's text to clarify its implications on closed sets.
  • Explore additional examples of topologies generated by various metrics to deepen understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and educators seeking to clarify concepts related to pseudometrizability and the properties of different topological spaces.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
I need help in order to make sense of an Example of Stephen Willard's on the trivial topology and the trivial pseudometric ... I find the example confusing ...
I am reading Stephen Willard: General Topology ... ... and am currently focused on Chapter 1: Set Theory and Metric Spaces and am currently focused on Section 2: Metric Spaces ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand Example 3.2(d) ... .. Example 3.2(d) reads as follows:
Willard - Example 3.2 (d) ... .png
and Example 2.7(e) reads as follows:
Willard - Example 2.7 (e) ... .png
In Example 3.2(d) we read the following:

" ... It is pseudometrizable since it is the topology generated by the trivial pseudometric on X, by part (e) of Example 2.7. ... ... "I am somewhat lost by this example ...

Can someone please demonstrate that (X, ##\tau## ) is the topology generated by the trivial pseudometric on X ... and explain the relation to part (e) of Example 2.7. ...Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you remind us of the meaning of "Pseudometrizable" and "Pseudo metric"?
 
Hello Peter. Good to hear from you. Hope you're managing OK in the current difficult times.

The trivial pseudometric on a space is the one that says the distance between any two points is zero. It is 'pseudo' because a real metric requires a nonzero distance between any distinct points.

The topology generated by a metric is the one generated by the open balls of the metric. An open ball centred on P with radius r is the set of all points with distance less than r from P. Under the trivial pseudometric, for any point P, all points in the space are in every open ball of nonzero radius, because they are all distance zero away!
So the only open balls are the empty set (r=0, P anywhere ) and the universal set (r>0, P anywhere). The topology generated by those two is the trivial topology that consists of just those two open sets.
 
I don't think I agree with (e) that one-point sets are closed. Consider where X = {1, 2}. Under the trivial topology, the open sets are {} and {1, 2}. The closed sets are the complements of those, which are {1, 2} and {}. As you can see, neither of the one-point sets {1} or {2} is open or closed. In the discrete topology - the maximal topology that is in some sense the opposite of the indiscrete/trivial topology - one-point sets are closed, as well as open ("clopen"). That's because the topology is defined by every one-point set being open, and every one-point set is the complement of the union of all the other points. That union is open, so the one-point set is closed.
 
andrewkirk said:
I don't think I agree with (e) that one-point sets are closed. Consider where X = {1, 2}. Under the trivial topology, the open sets are {} and {1, 2}. The closed sets are the complements of those, which are {1, 2} and {}. As you can see, neither of the one-point sets {1} or {2} is open or closed. In the discrete topology - the maximal topology that is in some sense the opposite of the indiscrete/trivial topology - one-point sets are closed, as well as open ("clopen"). That's because the topology is defined by every one-point set being open, and every one-point set is the complement of the union of all the other points. That union is open, so the one-point set is closed.

I agree with this. In general in any space with 2 or more poinys that has the indiscrete topology (thus only nothing and everything are open sets), no singelton is closed.
 
andrewkirk said:
I don't think I agree with (e) that one-point sets are closed. Consider where X = {1, 2}. Under the trivial topology, the open sets are {} and {1, 2}. The closed sets are the complements of those, which are {1, 2} and {}. As you can see, neither of the one-point sets {1} or {2} is open or closed. In the discrete topology - the maximal topology that is in some sense the opposite of the indiscrete/trivial topology - one-point sets are closed, as well as open ("clopen"). That's because the topology is defined by every one-point set being open, and every one-point set is the complement of the union of all the other points. That union is open, so the one-point set is closed.
Hi Andrew ...

I am fine, thanks ... hope that you are well also ...

Thanks for clarifying the issue ... especially the point of Example 2.7(e) ... that is the part that confused me ...

Peter
 
Math_QED said:
I agree with this. In general in any space with 2 or more poinys that has the indiscrete topology (thus only nothing and everything are open sets), no singelton is closed.

Thanks Math_QED ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K