Gold Member
- 2,828
- 12,404
Very Spacy!pinball1970 said:
Very Spacy!pinball1970 said:
It doesn't look real does it? More like CGI it is so bright.BillTre said:Very Spacy!
Tom.G said:That image reminds me of a dog trying to snatch a cookie that was tossed to it!
How could anyone refuse that dog a treat?DennisN said:
mfb said:There are rumors that 55 Cancri might be one of the first, or even the first, target. It has five known exoplanets, the innermost orbits the star in less than a day.
Note from Nature said:We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.
Abstract said:and indicate a bona fide volatile atmosphere likely rich in CO2 or CO
NASA blog: https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2024/05...ce-telescope-finds-most-distant-known-galaxy/pinball1970 said:JWST confirms early galaxy, formed 300 million years after the Big bang.
Scientists recently got a big surprise from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope when they turned the observatory toward a group of young stars called WL 20. The region has been studied since the 1970s with at least five telescopes, but it took Webb’s unprecedented resolution and specialized instruments to reveal that what researchers long thought was one of the stars, WL 20S, is actually a pair that formed about 2 million to 4 million years ago.
The discovery was made using Webb’s Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) and was presented at the 244th meeting of the American Astronomical Society on June 12. MIRI also found that the twins have matching jets of gas streaming into space from their north and south poles.
The team got another surprise when additional observations by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), a group of more than 60 radio antennas in Chile, revealed that disks of dust and gas encircle both stars. Based on the stars’ age, it’s possible that planets are forming in those disks.
The combined results indicate that the twin stars are nearing the end of this early period of their lives, which means scientists will have the opportunity to learn more about how the stars transition from youth into adulthood.
Wow, this is awesome. Folks are wanting to use Webb more than there is time in a year. Hopefully, this means the telescope can be used for a few decades just as Hubble is almost 35 years old.pinball1970 said:Sombrero galaxy is around 30 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Virgo.
View attachment 353917
From phys.org this week.
"General Observer time with Webb is more competitive than ever. A record-breaking 2,377 proposals were submitted by the 15 October 2024 deadline, requesting about 78,000 hours of observation time. This is an oversubscription rate—the ratio defining the observation hours requested versus the actual time available in one year of Webb's operations—of around 9 to 1."
Your logic escapes me. The fact that it is oversubscribed (and will likely remain so for decades, if we are lucky enough to have it last that long) has no bearing on its longevity.AlexB23 said:Wow, this is awesome. Folks are wanting to use Webb more than there is time in a year. Hopefully, this means the telescope can be used for a few decades just as Hubble is almost 35 years old.
It increases the probability of repair missions.phinds said:Your logic escapes me. The fact that it is oversubscribed (and will likely remain so for decades, if we are lucky enough to have it last that long) has no bearing on its longevity.
Yeah, but the government may fund the telescope for longer if it remains so popular.phinds said:Your logic escapes me. The fact that it is oversubscribed (and will likely remain so for decades, if we are lucky enough to have it last that long) has no bearing on its longevity.
Aren't repair missions out of the question with regards to its location?Frabjous said:It increases the probability of repair missions.
Depends what you mean by repair, they can do things remotely, I would check out the work arounds they did remotely to Voyager 2. More primitive kit and further away (a lot)Arjan82 said:Aren't repair missions out of the question with regards to its location?