The discussion centers on the advancements in jet pack technology, particularly for military and search and rescue applications. Participants note that while these jet packs have been in development for over two decades, recent improvements have made them more viable for specific uses, such as ship-to-ship transfers. However, there is skepticism regarding their practicality and cost-effectiveness, with some labeling them as "cute" but "nearly useless." The conversation also touches on potential future developments, such as integrating tactical shields and improving stabilization mechanisms.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for military technology analysts, emergency response professionals, and enthusiasts of personal flight innovations looking to understand the current state and future potential of jet pack applications.
Well, nearly is not entirely, but yeah, very expensive for the likely practical benefit.DaveE said:
the cool factor is there.I think it's not that bad. Definitely not battle-ready, but - well, military is not just about battle.DaveE said:
Yeah, I read about this on some EMS forums last year. The consensus was that since you can't carry much equipment and you need to wait for the hoist helicopter anyway to get your patient(s) out, there is not much advantage over the helicopter in the first place.Borek said: