The discussion revolves around the concept and practicality of jet packs, particularly in military and civilian applications such as ship-to-ship transfers and search and rescue operations. Participants explore the technological advancements, potential uses, and perceived value of these devices.
Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the effectiveness or practicality of jet packs. Some view them as a waste of resources, while others see potential applications, particularly in civilian contexts.
Participants acknowledge limitations in the current designs, such as the need for arm stabilization and the challenges of carrying equipment. The discussion also reflects varying definitions of utility in military versus civilian contexts.
Individuals interested in advancements in personal transportation technology, military applications, or search and rescue operations may find this discussion relevant.
Well, nearly is not entirely, but yeah, very expensive for the likely practical benefit.DaveE said:
the cool factor is there.I think it's not that bad. Definitely not battle-ready, but - well, military is not just about battle.DaveE said:
Yeah, I read about this on some EMS forums last year. The consensus was that since you can't carry much equipment and you need to wait for the hoist helicopter anyway to get your patient(s) out, there is not much advantage over the helicopter in the first place.Borek said: