The Kubo Formula of Hall Conductivity

cometzir
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Several papers (eg. Di Xiao, et. al, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, RevModPhys, 82,2010)mentioned a formula to calculate the Hall conductivity(See the picture).This formula is used in an two dimensional system, v1 and v2 are velocity operators in x and y direction, Phi0 and PhiN are ground and excited state vector.
The papers claim that this formula can be derived from the Kubo identity, but I am not sure how this can be done, since the form of Kubo formla is quite different from this expression.
Could anyone help me with the derivation?
 

Attachments

  • Figure.PNG
    Figure.PNG
    3.3 KB · Views: 936
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are v1 and v2?
 
DrDu said:
What are v1 and v2?

Sorry for unclearly description.
This formula is used in a two dimensional system. v1 and v2 are velocity operators in x and y direction
 
Which part is unfamiliar to you? The general linear response formula involves the time correlation function of the observable and the applied field. In a Hall measurement, the current is measured in the direction orthogonal to the applied field, which is why vx and vy show up. Writing the field in terms of the current density then gives the time integral of a current-current (or velocity-velocity) correlation function and performing the time evolution in the basis of eigenstates (Lehmann representation) should give the final result.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top