The Mathematics of Airfoil Design

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mathematical methods involved in the design of airfoils, exploring various approaches and theories relevant to aerodynamics. Participants express interest in the role of calculus, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and other mathematical techniques in airfoil design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the calculus of variations is used in airfoil design and expresses a lack of knowledge about deriving wing shapes.
  • Another participant suggests that while calculus of variations may play a role, basic airfoil design often relies on Thin Airfoil Theory and the analysis of coefficients related to flow properties, such as lift and moment coefficients.
  • A different participant introduces the concept of conformal mapping, specifically mentioning Zhukovski transforms and the proprietary methods used in the Eppler airfoil series for creating complex airfoil shapes.
  • Another contributor emphasizes the use of CFD and wind-tunnel tests, noting the reliance on Navier-Stokes equations and their effectiveness in simulating turbulent effects, while offering to share academic references for further reading.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on the mathematical techniques used in airfoil design, with no consensus reached on the primary methods or their applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various mathematical approaches, but the discussion lacks clarity on the specific conditions under which each method is applicable, and there are unresolved aspects regarding the integration of these techniques in practical design scenarios.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in aerodynamics, aerospace engineering, and the mathematical foundations of fluid dynamics may find this discussion relevant.

dydxforsn
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
My question is kind of simple, does the calculus of variations find its way into the design of the shape of an airfoil?

I'm interested in what kind of mathematics gets used in basic airfoil design. I suspect the calculus of variations must be involved, but I know nothing about deriving the shape of a plane wing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Answer: Sort of...

It depends on how you define "design" and where you're looking for the calculus. For example, a very rudimentary aspect of airfoil design, which is very limited but useful for a basic understanding of airfoil properties is Thin Airfoil Theory.

Also, very important to designing an airfoil or wing is determining the rate of change of various coefficients with respect to flow properties, say lift coefficient vs. aoa or moment coefficient vs. aoa:

\frac{dC_l}{d\alpha} ; \frac{dC_m}{d\alpha}

There's also the new theory of stall, which is useful in the same respect that T.A.T is.

In the more rigorous design of airfoils, the calculus is maybe more obscure. Airfoils are designed nearly exclusively via CFD (the exceptions being cases like an R/C maker). CFD involves the solution of PDE's such as the Navier-Stokes equation.
 
a lot of airfoil design uses conformal mapping. Zhukovski transforms are used to map the flow around a cylinder to a flow of an airfoil. The "Eppler" airfoil series also uses conformal mapping methods to create much more complicated airfoils; I believe the specific method that is used is a well kept proprietary secret.
 
I just use CFD and wind-tunnel tests. The most common CFD programs use Navier-Stokes equations with some additions to simulate turbulent affects. You'd be surprised how accurate they are when compared to the physical experiments. If you'd like to actually see the equations and the methods used to solve them. I can refer you to some nice PhD papers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
6K