The Maxwell Speed Distribution in 2D

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Maxwell Speed Distribution in two dimensions, specifically addressing the normalization of the integral involving the expression v*exp(-αv²). The key equation mentioned is the number of states with speed between u and u+du, which is given by 2π*u du. Participants highlight the challenges of integrating by parts and using the Gaussian integral for normalization. A suggested approach involves substituting α*v² to simplify the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell Speed Distribution
  • Familiarity with Gaussian integrals
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts
  • Basic concepts of probability density functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Maxwell Speed Distribution in 2D
  • Learn advanced integration techniques, focusing on substitution methods
  • Explore the properties and applications of Gaussian integrals
  • Investigate normalization of probability distributions in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of speed distributions.

fatherdaly
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


YfFkl.png


It seemed much easier to screencap than to write out.

Homework Equations



It helps to know that the number of states with speed between u and u+du is 2pi*u du

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried quite a few things but every time I get to trying to normalise I either get stuck integrating by parts over and over, or using http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integral" <that, which doesn't arrive at the answer wanted.

If someone could give me a push in the right direction it would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need some substitution to make the integral doable.
 
Ok so I have the integral of v*exp(-\alphav2) dv between 0 and infinity to normalise. I don't know how a substitution would help because you would still have two functions multiplied by one another.

Edit: I think I'm being stupid. I've substituted for alpha*v^2. Hopefully it will work.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
2K