The Motion of Charged Particle in Electric Fields Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the smallest possible distance between two electrons fired at 3.5x106 m/s directly at each other. Participants identified a discrepancy between their calculations and the book's solution, specifically regarding the formula used. The correct relationship for energy is established as energy = qV = Fr = kq1q2/r, rather than kq1q2/r2. The book referenced is "Nelson 12 Physics," which was critiqued for using an incorrect formula for energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and forces
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's Law
  • Knowledge of energy conservation in electric systems
  • Basic principles of kinematics in particle motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Coulomb's Law and its applications
  • Study the relationship between electric potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Learn about the behavior of charged particles in electric fields
  • Examine the implications of particle interactions at high velocities
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the dynamics of charged particles in electric fields will benefit from this discussion.

Freeq
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
3. Two electrons are fired at 3.5x10^6 m/s directly at each
other.
(a) Calculate the smallest possible distance between the
two electrons.

(b) Is it likely that two electrons in this situation will actually
get this close to each other if the experiment is
performed? Explain your answer.

Hello, let's look at question 3(a). I just did that question, but I got different answer than the one in the book.
There is the book solution is in the attachment.

I'm concerned about a mistake in the formula. I think that there is no square in r. Even two pages after, you can see that there is no square there. How is this Possible?
 

Attachments

  • dsa2.jpg
    dsa2.jpg
    10.6 KB · Views: 617
  • dsa3.jpg
    dsa3.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 548
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Freeq! :smile:
Freeq said:
I'm concerned about a mistake in the formula. I think that there is no square in r. Even two pages after, you can see that there is no square there. How is this Possible?

Yes, you're right. :smile:

The dimensions there are completely wrong (and the units at the end combine to m1/2, not m). :frown:

energy = qV = Fr = kq1q2/r not kq1q2/r2 :rolleyes:

(which book is this?)​
 
Nelson 12 Physics. It looks like they used formula for electric force, but not energy. However, I still think it is a good book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K