The peak-to-peak ripple voltage

  • Thread starter Thread starter gazp1988
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ripple Voltage
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the peak-to-peak ripple voltage (Vpp) for a power supply using a bridge rectifier and a reservoir capacitor. The relevant formula is Vpp = I / (2 f C), where I is the load current, f is the frequency, and C is the capacitance. The user initially misinterpreted the load current as load resistance, leading to incorrect calculations. After clarification, the correct value for Vpp was determined to be 0.426 V using the proper parameters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical circuits and components, specifically rectifiers.
  • Familiarity with the concept of ripple voltage in power supplies.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between current, voltage, and resistance (Ohm's Law).
  • Basic proficiency in using formulas for electrical calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the operation of bridge rectifiers and their impact on ripple voltage.
  • Learn about the effects of load resistance on ripple voltage in power supply circuits.
  • Explore the use of capacitors in smoothing out voltage fluctuations in power supplies.
  • Investigate the differences between full-wave and half-wave rectification methods.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, hobbyists working on power supply design, and professionals involved in circuit design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

gazp1988
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 9 V power supply delivers 2 A to a resistive load. The a.c. supply is 230 V, 50 Hz and a bridge rectifier is used in conjunction with a 0.047 farad reservoir capacitor.

Homework Equations


Vpp = 1/(2FCRL) * VC

The Attempt at a Solution


1/(2*50*0.047*2) * 9
=0.957v
after doing research it says that the frequency will be double due to it being a bridge rectifier because its a full wave. if this is the case then is the 2 in the equation taking this into consideration. am i on the right track with my answer

cheers :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
gazp1988 said:
Vpp = 1/(2FCRL) * VC
Could you clarify this equation? Where did you get it? Are the parenthesis correct? The units don't seem consistent to me -- for example, the units of the LHS are Volts, but the units of the RHS don't seem to come out as Volts (unless I'm misinterpreting the parenthesis.

BTW, it helps if you can post equations in LaTeX format -- that usually removes the ambiguity. A tutorial on LaTeX can be found here: https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/

Finally, it would help if we could have a figure to talk this problem through. I'll post one that I found via a Google Images search:

http://macao.communications.museum/images/exhibits/2_16_0_12_eng.png
2_16_0_12_eng.png
 
Thank you for your quick reply.

Vpp=/ frac{1} {2FCRl} {Vc}

This equation came from my notes that were attached to the assignment equation
 
gazp1988 said:
Thank you for your quick reply.

Vpp=/ frac{1} {2FCRl} {Vc}

This equation came from my notes that were attached to the assignment equation
Is this intended to be this?
Vpp = \frac{1}{2FCRI} Vc
 
The common approximation for the ripple voltage for a full-wave rectifier is

##V_{pp} = \frac{V_o}{2 f C R_L}##

where ##V_o## is the DC output voltage, ##R_L## is the load resistance.

Since ##V_o / R_L## is the DC load current, it can also be written as:

##V_{pp} = \frac{I}{2 f C}##

This approximation makes certain assumptions about the form of the discharge curve (straight line assuming constant load current) and that the discharge occurs over the full time interval between the waveform peaks. In reality the curve will be an exponential decay and the discharge is "caught" by the rising sinewave voltage just prior to the next peak. As a result the approximation formula will produce a value that is slightly high.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
thank you for your responses.
yes berkeman, its suppose to be like that.

i have used both above formula and gave me the same answer of 0.957

Vpp = 9/(2 x 50 x 0.047 x 2) = 0.957
Vpp = 4.5/(2 x 50 x 0.047) = 0.957
 
gazp1988 said:
Vpp = 9/(2x50x0.047x2) = 0.957
Vpp = 4.5/(2x50x0.047) = 0.957
Can you explain each of the quantities in the formulae? What value are you giving the load resistance?
 
9 = dc output
2 = double the frequency
50 = frequency
0.047 = reservoir capacitor
2 = load resistance given in the question, is this information you wanted
 
  • #10
gazp1988 said:
9 = dc output
2 = double the frequency
50 = frequency
0.047 = reservoir capacitor
2 = load resistance given in the question, is this information you wanted
All is good except for the load resistance. How did you obtain its value? It was not given directly in the problem statement.
 
  • #11
i was assuming that 2A stated in the question was the load resistance or as quoted in the question resistive load
 
  • #12
gazp1988 said:
i was assuming that 2A stated in the question was the load resistance or as quoted in the question resistive load
2 A has unit A for Amperes. It's the load current. Let me re-write the opening statement of the problem:

"A 9 Volt power supply delivers 2 Amps to a resistive load."
 
  • #13
i see i have made a mistake now.
using the second formula above:
gneill said:
Since Vo/RLVo/RLV_o / R_L is the DC load current, it can also be written as:

Vpp=I2fCVpp=I2fCV_{pp} = \frac{I}{2 f C}

Vpp= 4.5/(2 x 50 x 0.047)
 
  • #14
I think you're plugging things into the wrong places in the formulas. The formula I believe that you're trying to use now is:

##V_{pp} = \frac{I}{2 f C}##

where ##I## is the load current. There is no load resistance value in this version.
 
  • #15
i see what i have done, sorry.
I = 2...
Vpp = 2 / (2 x 50 x 0.047) = 0.426
 
  • #16
Yes. Much better :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
23K