The physics behind mixing coloured pigments (questions inside post)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TomP86
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of mixing colored pigments, specifically focusing on how different pigments combine to create perceived colors in the human eye. Participants explore concepts related to color perception, the behavior of pigments, and the biological mechanisms involved in color detection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes how mixing yellow and red pigments results in orange due to the common wavelengths reflected by both pigments.
  • Another participant suggests that the perception of purple from mixing red and blue pigments is due to the way cone cells in the eye process these colors, rather than a common reflected color.
  • A participant questions why red and blue, which have no common reflected color, are perceived as purple, referencing the concept of 'impure color' and how the average of wavelengths is interpreted by the eye.
  • Some participants mention the role of the RGB photoreceptor cones and how their responses to different wavelengths contribute to color perception.
  • One participant argues that the absence of a common reflected color should result in black, referencing the principles of subtractive color mixing and the primary colors used in pigment mixing (Cyan, Magenta, Yellow).
  • Another participant discusses the complexities of color mixing in practical applications, such as printing and television, highlighting the differences between additive and subtractive color mixing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how pigments mix and how colors are perceived. There is no consensus on the mechanisms behind the perception of colors like purple when mixing red and blue pigments, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of common reflected colors in pigment mixing.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various concepts from color theory, including the roles of different wavelengths and the biological mechanisms of color perception. There are mentions of limitations in understanding due to the complexity of human vision and the specific characteristics of pigments.

TomP86
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Hi all. My question is regarding the mixing of 2 pigments (such as paints) to form a uniform colour in the retina.

I understand mixing yellow and red create orange. This can be easy seen as red pigment will reflect a little orange light and yellow pigment will reflect a little orange light indevidually (where they are not mixed), so during the subtraction of mixing them together, the orange is the colour in common they both reflect so the eye precieved it as orange.

Simmilar, mixing yellow and blue yeilds the same result making it green with in the wave length inbetween yellow and blue.

What I am having some difficulty with is the mixing of red (780nm) with blue(450nm). There is no common reflected colour as scene in the 2 examples above (Y and O, and B and Y). Im trying to understand how our mind precieves this colour as purple.

From online searching it seems to be a biological answer based on the RGB photoreceptor cones in our eyes.

If I followed the proceedure above for calculating a mixture of red and blue it would result in black as there is no common reflected colour. But this is clearly not the case.

So when you mix 2 pigments together, what actually happens. Do the molecule from the first pigment mix together (at seeminly random) with the second pigments molecues and as the light wave reflects from each individule (separate pigment molecule) it reflects the light that that particular pigment molocule does not obsorb?

or is there a chemical reaction that bonds the 2 pigments? (My chestry knolwege is limited at the moment). And if so, what wavelength will the bonded molecule reflect?

If the answer is the former, (the surface with the mixed pigment reflects a proportion of wave pigments 1's reflecetive wavelength and of pigments 2's reflective wavelength depending on the ratio quantity that was mixed), then the perception of the purple is a color calculated by the human mind? Or is there a physical explaination?

Thank you very much in advance,

Yours Tom P.
 

Attachments

  • 1693196219870.png
    1693196219870.png
    51.4 KB · Views: 122
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
TomP86 said:
I understand mixing yellow and red create orange. This can be easy seen as red pigment will reflect a little orange light and yellow pigment will reflect a little orange light indevidually (where they are not mixed), so during the subtraction of mixing them together, the orange is the colour in common they both reflect so the eye precieved it as orange.
While this may happen to some extent, the main reason it looks orange is because of the way the eye and brain process colors. In short, the red and yellow pigments excite your cone cells in your eyes in such a way as to cause you to perceive it as orange. The same for purple. See here for more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_vision#Physiology_of_color_perception

TomP86 said:
So when you mix 2 pigments together, what actually happens. Do the molecule from the first pigment mix together (at seeminly random) with the second pigments molecues and as the light wave reflects from each individule (separate pigment molecule) it reflects the light that that particular pigment molocule does not obsorb?

or is there a chemical reaction that bonds the 2 pigments? (My chestry knolwege is limited at the moment). And if so, what wavelength will the bonded molecule reflect?
The former. Each pigment reflects its own spectrum, the combination of which gives the overall material its color.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Baluncore
Thank you for the reply guys. To help clarfy my question better Im trying to ask why do our eyes precieve the presense of only 2 wavelengths (red and blue) as purple.

In my physics book there is a concept of 'impure colour' whereby 2 (or more) different wavelengths of colour are interpreted in our mind or retina (not sure which) as an average of the 2 or more colours. eg. red and green (700nm and 540nm respectivly) average to make 620nm (yellow). So our eyes see the object as yellow (simmilar to how a tv works)

So in the case of red and blue we have 700nm and 480nm respectivley and an average of 590 which is an orange colour. So why is it purple?

After doing some research I found the answer I believe and it is due to the strange way our receptors work (they are not perfect bell curves)

1693266958724.png

Credit to yeti on stackexchange as he found the answer. I think 20 years ago I actually learnt this but I've forgotten now. The L receptor is more absorbing on the lower wavelengths for colours whereby the violet wavelength area is so if we mixed red from the L and some of the M receptors with this we replicate the purple colour scene in accordance to this graph. The answer is our retiners interpret things with a spceicifc way as represented in this graph

Based on the graph above a colour chart can be drawn describing how the receptors perceive light based on different proportions on each receptor. This chart can show you how to fix what colour is produced by each wavelength and what colour can be produced by mixing different wavelengths in different proportions. For a full really good explanation, just read this post
1693269840403.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juanda and Drakkith
TomP86 said:
There is no common reflected colour as scene in the 2
If there is no common reflected colour then the result will be black . This is why the primaries for mixing pigments (subtractive mixing) are Cyan, Magenta and Yellow which, as you may remember are the product of additive colour mixing of, respectively Blue plus green, Red plus blue and Red plus green. If you use 'perfect' Red Green and Blue Pigments, the results will always be a dark result or black.
Your TV primary elements are RGB and your printer inks are CMY so that proves my point.
Also, C is often referred to as -R, M is referred to as -G and Y is referred to as -B. There are practical reasons why the detailed reflection spectra of the pigments are chosen the way they are is that you still want bright, saturated colours, which subtractive mixing militates against so there are compromises. In particular, if you want really good matches for some familiar colours (e.g.Coca cola Red) high quality printing uses extra 'spot' colours in addition to three colour printing. TV (additive) mixing is much less hassle whereas old Cinema film had really rubbish colourimetry. They got away with it in darkened cinemas because eyes adapted and learned to ignore the poor colour.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
84K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K