I The potential on the rim of a uniformly charged disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem from Griffiths' Electrodynamics concerning the potential on the rim of a uniformly charged disk. The original approach involved calculating the potential using a surface charge density and a specific vector formulation. A key point of confusion was the transition from the expression R^2 + r^2 - 2Rr to R^2 + r^2 - 2Rrcos(theta), which relates to the law of cosines. Clarification was provided regarding the use of the inner product in vector calculations, leading to a better understanding of the derivation. The discussion concludes with an acknowledgment of the newfound clarity in the problem-solving approach.
chaos333
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
This comes from Griffiths' Electrodynamics and is problem 2.51 or 2.52, the disk has a surface charge density and my usual approach to solving these problems is to pick an area element and find a way to create a vector to the point(s) at which the potential is evaluated at. I sent a picture of my thought process and attempt at the problem. The solution involves a R^2+r^2-2Rrcos(theta) instead of R^2+r^2-2Rr that I have and I don't know how they arrived to that. Is my vector wrong or something else?
1720118052126.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anuttarasammyak said:
The law of cosines https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_cosines might be helpful.
I understand the answer involves the law of cosine formula, but how was that derived from the vector?
 
1720144524123.png


Here not Rr but ##\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{r}##, an inner product, for |\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r}|^2 =(\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r})\cdot(\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r}).
 
anuttarasammyak said:
View attachment 347821

Here not Rr but ##\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{r}##, an inner product, for |\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r}|^2 =(\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r})\cdot(\mathbf{R}-\mathbf{r}).
This makes a lot of sense now, thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top