The pressures at the center of a nuke are greater than in the earth's core?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Researcher X
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center Core Nuke
AI Thread Summary
The pressure at the center of a nuclear explosion, measured at 530 TPa, significantly exceeds the Earth's core pressure of 380 GPa by over 1000 times, raising questions about comparability due to the transient nature of nuclear pressure. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes have a tested tensile strength of 63 GPa, with a theoretical upper limit of 300 GPa, which is insufficient for survival in extreme conditions like the Earth's core. The discussion highlights the disparity between theoretical material strength and practical applications, noting that real-world materials often have flaws that reduce their effective strength. Additionally, while inertial confinement fusion can achieve even higher pressures, these are also only sustained briefly. Overall, the feasibility of creating a vehicle capable of withstanding such extreme environments remains highly questionable.
Researcher X
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Wikipedia has an Ivy Mike level nuke at 530 TPa, and the core pressure is at 380 GPa. That's a factor of over 1000 times. I'm wondering whether these are exactly comparable, since the pressure at the core is constant, whereas in a nuke, it's relatively brief.

A multi walled carbon nanotube was tested with a tensile strength of 63 Gigapascals. Apparently, they have a theoretical upper limit of 300 GPa, so that's a bit short of surviving at the core. Is that a theoretical upper limit on strength full stop or just nanotubes? Then, there's the temperature which is similar to the surface of the sun at the core as well.

Is there any hope of making a vehicle which could survive down there? I take it no material can survive within ten feet of a nuclear explosion though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Researcher X said:
Wikipedia has an Ivy Mike level nuke at 530 TPa, and the core pressure is at 380 GPa. That's a factor of over 1000 times. I'm wondering whether these are exactly comparable, since the pressure at the core is constant, whereas in a nuke, it's relatively brief.
You can get even higher pressures with Inertial Contained Fusion - but not for very long!

A multi walled carbon nanotube was tested with a tensile strength of 63 Gigapascals. Apparently, they have a theoretical upper limit of 300 GPa
There is a lot of difference between the theoretical strength of a material based purely on atomic bonds and the real strenght of an object with cracks, joints etc.
You can grow single crystals of metals that are many times stronger than a metal bar - but they aren't much practical use.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top