I The purpose of trigonometric axes in plot of electron clusters, ATLAS

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the choice of using cos(phi) * tan(theta) and sin(phi) * tan(theta) for the x and y axes in electron cluster plots from proton-proton collisions at CERN. This method allows for consistent angle comparisons across different experiments, which is more effective than using physical dimensions. The non-zero depth of the calorimeter necessitates this approach to avoid smearing clusters that diverge from the interaction point. Projecting onto a fixed plane is considered less efficient and less informative. Overall, the chosen plotting method enhances clarity and accuracy in analyzing electron clusters.
kimi7335
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Why use trigonometric axes for the plot?
I have been doing some reading on electron reconstruction from proton-proton collisions at CERN. In some of the papers I have read, plots such as the one In the figure are included. What I would like to know is why they have chosen to plot the x and y axes as cos(phi) * tan(theta) and sin(phi) * tan(theta)?
 

Attachments

  • atlas_plot.png
    atlas_plot.png
    60.4 KB · Views: 88
Physics news on Phys.org
Angles can be compared across experiments, physical dimensions cannot. In addition the calorimeter has some non-zero depth, so just plotting x and y would smear out clusters that point away from the interaction point. You could project everything onto a fixed plane, but that's just extra effort for a less useful result.
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
14K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K