The shot at the beginning of Wanted was it possible?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hellicopter1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beginning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of a specific shot depicted in the movie "Wanted," where a character shoots an assassin from a significant distance, raising questions about the physics involved in such a scenario. Participants explore the portrayal of physics in media, particularly in action films, and share examples of unrealistic physics representations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the realism of the shot, suggesting it appears to defy gravity and does not follow the expected projectile motion.
  • Another participant notes that the bullet's trajectory in the movie does not resemble a curve, despite the long-range nature of the shot.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the accuracy of physics in movies, with one stating it would be more surprising to find correct physics than incorrect.
  • There is mention of the longest confirmed sniper kill, with conflicting claims about the distance, leading to a discussion about the accuracy of such records.
  • One participant critiques the entire film for its unrealistic physics, comparing it unfavorably to other films like "The Matrix."
  • Participants discuss the potential for misinformation in online sources, particularly regarding sniper kill distances, highlighting a recent edit to a Wikipedia page as an example of this issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the physics depicted in "Wanted" is unrealistic, but there is disagreement regarding the specifics of sniper kill distances and the accuracy of related claims. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the shot in the film.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about projectile motion and the definitions of sniper kill distances, which are not fully clarified or agreed upon.

hellicopter1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i'd like to know if the shot at the beginning of Wanted when the man shoots the other man from inside his house and kills the assisin on the roof is possible.. it seems that it was in the air way too long, was resisting gravity, and could no longer be considered a projectile because it looks as if it goes straight, rather than creating the parabola's arch that is necessary for projectiles.

also, if you can think of any examples in the media where the physics of something that happens aren't correct, let me know! it's fun to check things out like this when you know they've made mistakes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hellicopter1 said:
if you can think of any examples in the media where the physics of something that happens aren't correct

I think it would be more surprising to find something that is correct.
 
I've never seen the movie, but the trailer shown on TV shows stuff that is blatantly impossible, such as making a bullet curve by moving your arm while firing. All that would accomplish in reality is make you miss.
 
Danger said:
I've never seen the movie, but the trailer shown on TV shows stuff that is blatantly impossible, such as making a bullet curve by moving your arm while firing. All that would accomplish in reality is make you miss.

The shot the OP is referring to is a very long range rifle shot to the head from a heavily modified sniper rifle. I think the distance seemed to be several kilometers, but I don't remember what the path of the bullet showed by the movie was, except that it was not a "curve" shot.

I think the longest confirmed kill by a sniper rifle (at least in recent memory) is about 1.1 kilometers, by an Australian sniper in Afghanistan.
 
Animastryfe said:
I think the longest confirmed kill by a sniper rifle (at least in recent memory) is about 1.1 kilometers, by an Australian sniper in Afghanistan.

According to wiki longest kill is 2430 meters now - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Furlong.
 
hellicopter1 said:
also, if you can think of any examples in the media where the physics of something that happens aren't correct, let me know! it's fun to check things out like this when you know they've made mistakes.

Like has already been mentioned...it would be quicker to list the things that could actually happen. Hollywood is hardly the bastion of scientific integrity.

BTW...helicopter
 
Borek said:
According to wiki longest kill is 2430 meters now - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Furlong.

What a typo

Rob Furlong, a former corporal of the Canadian Forces, holds the record for the longest confirmed sniper kill in combat, at 20,430 metres (20,657 yards, or 10.51 miles).

As for that movie, everything in it was utter BS. I'm surprised everyone didnt float around the entire movie or walk on walls like in the Matrix. Hell even the Matrix had better physics in it.
 
no that second one you posted was a typo, all the other references say 2430 metres
 
Yes, that was what I meant...
 
  • #10
Pengwuino said:
What a typo

Rob Furlong, a former corporal of the Canadian Forces, holds the record for the longest confirmed sniper kill in combat, at 20,430 metres (20,657 yards, or 10.51 miles).

Well, according to the wiki history page that was changed AFTER I have seen the page few hours ago. Whoever is using IP 71.49.153.26 and modified the page adding zeros is a stupid idiot, not worth of being called a human. Obviously some people find such vandalism interesting, probably it helps them keep their egos up.

Could be interesting to check if anyone of the PF users uses that IP, I suppose Mentors can do it. That would make this person looking rather sad in my eyes.
 
  • #11
lol i thought so i guess i just associated it being directly under the first quote as meaning you thought the first was the typo.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
17K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K