The Significance of the Smallest Non-Zero Derivative for a Polynomial Function

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MiLara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of the smallest non-zero derivative of polynomial functions, particularly focusing on the implications of this derivative for understanding the function's behavior. Participants explore various polynomial forms, including cubic and quartic functions, and examine how derivatives relate to the function's characteristics and numerical relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the significance of the smallest non-zero derivative, using the example of the polynomial 6x^3 and its derivatives leading to the constant 36.
  • Others suggest that the term "smallest non-zero derivative" may only be meaningful within the context of polynomial functions, questioning its relevance for other types of functions.
  • A participant proposes a formula for the smallest non-zero derivative of the form nx^l, stating it is (l-1)!*n*l when l is a whole number.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between the number 36 and the values of 6n^3 for whole numbers, noting that they do not see a clear connection.
  • One participant mentions a potential relationship between the number 6 and the generation of whole number cubes through differences of differences of differences.
  • Another participant attempts to apply the same reasoning to the polynomial 2x^4, finding inconsistencies and questioning whether the method works for other polynomial forms.
  • There is a suggestion that for higher-order polynomials, the number of differences needed to generate terms increases, specifically noting that for a polynomial of order n, one must calculate up to the (n-1)th derivative before generating the nth term.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the significance of the smallest non-zero derivative, with some finding it meaningful in specific contexts while others question its broader applicability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the generalizability of the methods discussed for different polynomial forms.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the significance of derivatives may depend on the specific polynomial being analyzed, and there are unresolved questions regarding the application of the discussed methods to polynomials of different degrees.

MiLara
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What does a function's smallest non-zero derivative say about the function? For example, say we have a function that looks like 6x^3, if you keep taking the derivative of this function until you get the smallest non-zero derivative, in this case 6x^3 -> 18x^2 -> 36x -> 36, what is the significance of the number 36 to the function 6x^3? I know that each function has a specific smallest non-zero derivative, however, each non-zero derivative can be characteristic of an infinite amount of functions in you keep integrating it.

Is there anything to this thought, or am i just asking a pointless question?

also, i was playing with numbers and derived that for nx^l, when l is a whole number, the smallest non zero derivative is (l-1)!*n*l.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MiLara said:
What does a function's smallest non-zero derivative say about the function?
Smallest? If you're limited to polynomial functions, then perhaps you mean lowest degree.
For other functions, I don't think this is a meaningful term. For instance, with f(x) = cos(x), g(x) = ex, h(x) = 1/x, and many, many others.
MiLara said:
For example, say we have a function that looks like 6x^3, if you keep taking the derivative of this function until you get the smallest non-zero derivative, in this case 6x^3 -> 18x^2 -> 36x -> 36, what is the significance of the number 36 to the function 6x^3? I know that each function has a specific smallest non-zero derivative, however, each non-zero derivative can be characteristic of an infinite amount of functions in you keep integrating it.

Is there anything to this thought, or am i just asking a pointless question?
The only significance I can think of is not the number you end up with (if you do indeed end up with a constant) is in the particular derivatives.
First derivative gives you the slope of a line tangent to a curve (or the velocity if the function represents displacement).
Second derivative indicates the concavity of the function (or acceleration if the function represents displacement).
Third derivative indicates the rate of change of the 2nd derivative. In a displacement, velocity, acceleration context, the 3rd derivative indicates the "jerk."
There's one for the 4th derivative, but what it indicates escapes me at the moment.
MiLara said:
also, i was playing with numbers and derived that for nx^l, when l is a whole number, the smallest non zero derivative is (l-1)!*n*l.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest
MiLara said:
What does a function's smallest non-zero derivative say about the function? For example, say we have a function that looks like 6x^3, if you keep taking the derivative of this function until you get the smallest non-zero derivative, in this case 6x^3 -> 18x^2 -> 36x -> 36, what is the significance of the number 36 to the function 6x^3? I know that each function has a specific smallest non-zero derivative, however, each non-zero derivative can be characteristic of an infinite amount of functions in you keep integrating it.

Is there anything to this thought, or am i just asking a pointless question?

also, i was playing with numbers and derived that for nx^l, when l is a whole number, the smallest non zero derivative is (l-1)!*n*l.

If you were put in a room with a pen and paper and no calculator and asked to work out all the whole number cubes as high as you could, how would you do it?

Or, if you were asked to calculate the values of ##6n^3## for whole number ##n##? Would the number ##36## be helpful in any way?
 
PeroK said:
If you were put in a room with a pen and paper and no calculator and asked to work out all the whole number cubes as high as you could, how would you do it?

Or, if you were asked to calculate the values of ##6n^3## for whole number ##n##? Would the number ##36## be helpful in any way?
n 6n^3 6n^3/36
1 6 0.166666667
2 48 1.333333333 I am not seeing any relationships between 6n^3 and 36?
3 162 4.5
4 384 10.66666667
5 750 20.83333333
6 1296 36
7 2058 57.16666667
8 3072 85.33333333
9 4374 121.5
10 6000 166.6666667
 
PeroK said:
If you were put in a room with a pen and paper and no calculator and asked to work out all the whole number cubes as high as you could, how would you do it?

Or, if you were asked to calculate the values of ##6n^3## for whole number ##n##? Would the number ##36## be helpful in any way?
I did perhaps stumble upon a solution for (6n)^3 using 36. I got that (6n)^3 = n^2*6n*36. I think that it is just coincidental since I could not generalize this for any function that looks like (xn)^l because not all (xn)^l = n^2*xn*smallest non zero derivative.
 
Last edited:
MiLara said:
n 6n^3 6n^3/36
1 6 0.166666667
2 48 1.333333333 I am not seeing any relationships between 6n^3 and 36?
3 162 4.5
4 384 10.66666667
5 750 20.83333333
6 1296 36
7 2058 57.16666667
8 3072 85.33333333
9 4374 121.5
10 6000 166.6666667

It's easier to see the relationship between the number ##6## and ##n^3##

---, ---, ---, 0
---, ---, 1, 1
---, 6, 7, 8
6, 12, 19, 27
6, 18, 37, 64
6, 24, 61, 125

You can keep generating the whole number cubes by using ##6## as the difference of differences of differences.

For ##6n^3## the difference of differences of differences is ##36##.
 
PeroK said:
It's easier to see the relationship between the number ##6## and ##n^3##

---, ---, ---, 0
---, ---, 1, 1
---, 6, 7, 8
6, 12, 19, 27
6, 18, 37, 64
6, 24, 61, 125

You can keep generating the whole number cubes by using ##6## as the difference of differences of differences.

For ##6n^3## the difference of differences of differences is ##36##.
I tried to follow what I thought was your algorithm but with replacing 6 with 36. This is what i got.
__,__,__,0
__,__,1,1
__,36,37,38
36,72,109,147
36,108,217,364
36,144,361,725maybe I just need to expand this out further. Hmmm...I wonder if I can predict how many more columns I will need to get 6n^3.
Thank you for this little thought experiment.
 
MiLara said:
I tried to follow what I thought was your algorithm but with replacing 6 with 36. This is what i got.
__,__,__,0
__,__,1,1
__,36,37,38
36,72,109,147
36,108,217,364
36,144,361,725maybe I just need to expand this out further. Hmmm...I wonder if I can predict how many more columns I will need to get 6n^3.
Thank you for this little thought experiment.

You missed that for ##n = 1##, ##6n^3 = 6##. So, you were off on the wrong foot!

Also, for ##n = 2##, ##6n^3 = 48##. And not ##38##.
 
PeroK said:
You missed that for ##n = 1##, ##6n^3 = 6##. So, you were off on the wrong foot!

Also, for ##n = 2##, ##6n^3 = 48##. And not ##38##.
Ok I got it for 6x^3

--,--,--,--0
--,--,6,6
--,36,42,48
36,72,114,162
36,108,222,384
36,144,336,750However, when I try to do the same for another function, let's say 2x^4, it does not seem to work.
So, if I keep taking the derivative of 2x^4 -> 8x^3 -> 24x^2 -> 48x -> 48, then try to use 48 as the difference of differences of differences, i get the following

--,--,--,0
--,--,2,2
--,48,50,52

But when x=2, 2x^4 = 32, not 52.
Does this only work for cubes?
 
  • #10
MiLara said:
Ok I got it for 6x^3

--,--,--,--0
--,--,6,6
--,36,42,48
36,72,114,162
36,108,222,384
36,144,336,750However, when I try to do the same for another function, let's say 2x^4, it does not seem to work.
So, if I keep taking the derivative of 2x^4 -> 8x^3 -> 24x^2 -> 48x -> 48, then try to use 48 as the difference of differences of differences, i get the following

--,--,--,0
--,--,2,2
--,48,50,52

But when x=2, 2x^4 = 32, not 52.
Does this only work for cubes?

With ##x^4## it's the fourth derivative that is a constant! So, need an extra difference of differences.

It works for any polynomial. But, for a polynomial of order ##n## you must first calculate up to ##n-1## by hand before the ##n^{th}## term can be generated using the algorithm.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K