The static Killing vectors in Kruskal coordinates

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
Altabeh
Messages
657
Reaction score
0
Hello

In the Kruskal extension of the Schwarzschild metric, where the metric is now transformed into the new coordinates [tex](T,X,\theta,\phi)[/tex], the line element is

[tex]ds^2=-\frac{32M^3e^{-r/2m} }{r}(-dT^2+dX^2)+r^2(d\theta^2+\sin^2(\theta)d\phi^2),[/tex]

with

[tex]\left (r/2m-1 \right ) e^{r/2m}=X^2-T^2[/tex] (1)
and [tex]t/2m=2\tanh^{-1}(T/X).[/tex] (2)

From the equation (1) we see that [tex]\nabla_{\alpha}r=0[/tex] at [tex]X=T=0[/tex] and this is obvious. Okay, but we know that the static Killing field [tex]\xi^{\alpha}[/tex] becomes collinear with [tex]\nabla_{\alpha}r=0[/tex] thus requiring [tex]\xi^{\alpha}[/tex] to also vanish there. My question is that how is this possible? Looking at the static Killing vectors of the Schwarzschild metric in a general Cartesian-like coordinate system [tex]x^{\mu}[/tex],
[tex]\xi^0=0[/tex] and [tex]{\xi}^{i}={\epsilon}^{{ik}}{x}^{k}[/tex]
where
[tex]\epsilon^{ik}=-\epsilon^{ki} =\left[ \begin {array}{ccc} 0&a&-b\\ \noalign{\medskip}-a&0&c<br /> \\ \noalign{\medskip}b&-c&0\end {array} \right],[/tex]

with [tex]a,b,c[/tex] being all arbitrary constants, how come the above requirement [tex](X=T=0)[/tex] gets all Killing vectors to vanish? My own view on the problem is that we must find the explicit expressions for [tex]r[/tex] and [tex]t[/tex] from (1) and (2), respectively, and then calculate the Killing vectors and put [tex]X=T=0.[/tex] Am I on the right track or what?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I haven't tried to read your post in detail.

I would use (1) and (2), and the chain rule for ordinary partial derivatives to calculate the static Killing vector field in Kruskal coordinates.
 
George Jones said:
Sorry, I haven't tried to read your post in detail.

I would use (1) and (2), and the chain rule for ordinary partial derivatives to calculate the static Killing vector field in Kruskal coordinates.

Would you mind going a little bit deep into details of the calculation!?

Thanks
AB
 
In Schwarzschild coordinates, the static Killing vector is [itex]\partial/\partial t[/itex], and

[tex] \frac{\partial}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} \frac{\partial}{\partial T} + \frac{\partial X}{\partial t} \frac{\partial}{\partial X},[/tex]

so the components of Killing vector [itex]\partial/\partial t[/itex] with respect to the [itex]\left\{ T, X, \theta, \phi \right\}[/itex] coordinates are

[tex] \left\{ \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial X}{\partial t}, 0, 0 \right\}.[/tex]

Differentiating (1) and (2) with respect to [itex]t[/itex] gives two linear equations in the two non-zero components.