The Theoretical Minimum book question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the dot product of vectors, particularly in the context of orthogonal vectors, as presented in "The Theoretical Minimum" book. Participants explore both mathematical and graphical interpretations of the concept.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to visualize the dot product and its implications for orthogonal vectors. They question how to represent the vectors graphically and explore the idea of connecting them in a way that might illustrate their relationship. Other participants provide insights into the concept of projection related to the dot product, while seeking further clarification on the term "projection."

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, with some providing explanations and analogies to clarify the idea of projection. There is a sense of progress as the original poster expresses understanding, but further questions remain regarding the graphical representation of the vectors.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes considerations of visualizing mathematical concepts and the implications of orthogonality in vector analysis. The original poster reflects on their thought process and assumptions about vector magnitudes and connections.

OrigamiCaptain
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm reading the book The Theoretical Minimum. I wonder if two one of the problems in the book can be thought of graphically. The mathematical solution didn't even occur to me, although it make perfect sense and probably should have been obvious.

1. Can you explain why the dot product of two vectors that are orthogonal is 0?

2. A dot B= abs(a)abs(b)cosθ

I know now that if it is orthogonal than θ=∏/2 and cos∏/2=0

Is there a way of visualizing i, j and k to get the same answer?3. For a second I thought that connecting x, y z together end to end would create a situation that would eliminate distance so the magnitude would equal zero, but after thinking about it a little more before posting this I don't believe that would work. I actually feel like there is something to this line of think though, which is why I'm asking this question.

Thank you for your time and consideration
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The dot product of two vectors can be thought of as the projection of one vector on the other- that's where the |b|cos(θ) comes from. If two vectors are orthogonal then the projections are of 0 length.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The dot product of two vectors can be thought of as the projection of one vector on the other- that's where the |b|cos(θ) comes from. If two vectors are orthogonal then the projections are of 0 length.

I think I get it, but could you be a little more specific what you mean by projection?

Thank you for the help.
 
The projection is like the shadow of an object on the ground (with the sun directly overhead).
If you are orthogonal (perpendicular) to the plane of the ground (and very, very skinny) then your shadow should be 0.
 
Got it! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K