The Time Independence of Normalization

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
On page 13 of Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics 2nd ed" David goes into a long (relatively speaking) proof of why a normalized pair of quantum state vectors will not at some time later become "un-normalized". It seems like just putting the Psi's in a braket the e^(-it) "time dependence" term would just cancel out -- showing that normalization is not time dependent. Could anyone take a shot at why this is not the case -- other than the fact he has not developed braket notation or shown that the time dependence a separate exponent factor? Maybe I just answered my own question :D Is there anything wrong with showing it this way?

Thanks,
Chris Maness
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The general wave function is built of a linear combination of the eigenfunctions. When you do this, the exponential time-dependent phases do not cancel out. When he shows that the normalization remains constant in time, he shows it for a general wave function that is a solution of just the Schrödinger equation, and not the eigenvalue equation in general.
 
Jorriss said:
While this is true, Griffiths does not introduce unitary operators, the time evolution operator, etc I believe and he certainly does not do it by page 13.

Well, it's enough to know that

[itex]\int \psi^* H \psi dx[/itex]

is real. That's because Schrödinger's equation implies that:

[itex]\dfrac{d}{dt} \int \psi^* \psi dx = \dfrac{2}{\hbar} Im(\int \psi^* H \psi dx)[/itex]

where [itex]Im[/itex] means the imaginary part.