The Time Independence of Normalization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the time independence of normalization in quantum mechanics, specifically referencing Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics 2nd ed." It is established that normalized quantum state vectors remain normalized over time, as demonstrated through the unitarity of the time evolution operator exp(-iHt), where H is the Hamiltonian operator. The participants clarify that while Griffiths does not introduce unitary operators or the time evolution operator by page 13, the proof of normalization's constancy is valid for general wave functions that solve the Schrödinger equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum state vectors and normalization
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of unitary operators and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of unitary operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the time evolution operator exp(-iHt) and its implications
  • Examine the derivation and implications of the Schrödinger equation
  • Explore Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" for deeper insights into normalization
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists interested in wave function behavior, and educators teaching quantum theory concepts.

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
On page 13 of Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics 2nd ed" David goes into a long (relatively speaking) proof of why a normalized pair of quantum state vectors will not at some time later become "un-normalized". It seems like just putting the Psi's in a braket the e^(-it) "time dependence" term would just cancel out -- showing that normalization is not time dependent. Could anyone take a shot at why this is not the case -- other than the fact he has not developed braket notation or shown that the time dependence a separate exponent factor? Maybe I just answered my own question :D Is there anything wrong with showing it this way?

Thanks,
Chris Maness
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The general wave function is built of a linear combination of the eigenfunctions. When you do this, the exponential time-dependent phases do not cancel out. When he shows that the normalization remains constant in time, he shows it for a general wave function that is a solution of just the Schrödinger equation, and not the eigenvalue equation in general.
 
Jorriss said:
While this is true, Griffiths does not introduce unitary operators, the time evolution operator, etc I believe and he certainly does not do it by page 13.

Well, it's enough to know that

\int \psi^* H \psi dx

is real. That's because Schrödinger's equation implies that:

\dfrac{d}{dt} \int \psi^* \psi dx = \dfrac{2}{\hbar} Im(\int \psi^* H \psi dx)

where Im means the imaginary part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K