The use of current transformers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of current transformers (CTs) in conjunction with a power-factor correction capacitor bank. Participants explore the feasibility of using existing CTs from a main switchboard for the capacitor bank's multifunctional needs, addressing technical specifications and operational concerns.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether an existing CT from the main switchboard can be used for both the capacitor bank and the ammeter simultaneously.
  • Several participants confirm that the capacitor bank is indeed a power-factor correction system and is switched by contactors with a controller.
  • Concerns are raised about the correct phasing and polarity of transformers and CTs, with implications for the operation of the capacitor banks.
  • Discussion includes the concept of 'burden' on the CTs, with one participant questioning how to measure it and whether saturation might occur if a single CT is used for multiple purposes.
  • Another participant suggests searching for information on "current transformer burden" and recommends installing a separate CT if the burden is too high.
  • There are warnings about the separation of CTs used for indication and control from those used for protective relaying, emphasizing safety considerations.
  • One participant mentions that the manufacturer of the capacitor bank did not provide useful information regarding the compatibility of the existing CTs.
  • Another participant references a document that indicates the CTs in question are designed for non-protective applications, urging caution in modifying existing setups.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the use of existing CTs, with no consensus reached on whether it is advisable to use one CT for both the capacitor bank and the main switchboard ammeter. Concerns about burden and safety are highlighted, indicating a lack of agreement on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the specifications and operational limits of the CTs and controllers involved. There is mention of potential issues with load distribution across phases and the implications for CT performance.

Who May Find This Useful

Electrical engineers, technicians working with power systems, and those involved in capacitor bank design and implementation may find this discussion relevant.

Shahram
Hello everyone,

Recently, i have designed a capacitor bank for a company which they already have their main switch board with metering stuff. The ammeter of the main switch board has its own CTs but for the capacitor bank I need to install a CT separately. The spec of existing CTs for main switch board is type AL4- 15VA- cl 0.5 FS 5 and 2000/5 A. There is a step down transformer with apparent power of 1250 KVA and capacitor bank sized around 460 Kvar. My question is could i use one of the existing CTs (say phase R) for the capacitor bank's multi function and the ammeter of the main switch board simultaneously? Thanks very much in advance for any help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Shahram. :welcome:

This is a power-factor correction capacitor bank?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Hi Shahram. :welcome:

This is a power-factor correction capacitor bank?
Hi
yes, this is a power factor correction capacitor bank.
 
Shahram said:
The ammeter of the main switch board has its own CTs but for the capacitor bank I need to install a CT separately.
Is this a contactor switched capacitor bank with a power factor controller using current transformer feedback?
 
Asymptotic said:
Is this a contactor switched capacitor bank with a power factor controller using current transformer feedback?
yes, this is a capacitor bank which is being switched by contactors with a controller (regulator).
 
Shahram said:
yes, this is a capacitor bank which is being switched by contactors with a controller (regulator).
Carefully and thoroughly study the power factor controller manual. The controllers I'm familiar with have CTs measuring current through each phase, potential transformers measuring line-to-line voltage across each phase, and use this information to determine how many cap banks must be turned on to obtain the power factor set point.

Transformer and CT phasing and 'polarity' must be correct. If they aren't, chances are none of the cap banks will turn on, or all of them will turn on and remain on. If the controller was designed to use 5 amp CTs then it may be possible to use the existing CTs depending upon the burden.
 
Asymptotic said:
Carefully and thoroughly study the power factor controller manual. The controllers I'm familiar with have CTs measuring current through each phase, potential transformers measuring line-to-line voltage across each phase, and use this information to determine how many cap banks must be turned on to obtain the power factor set point.

Transformer and CT phasing and 'polarity' must be correct. If they aren't, chances are none of the cap banks will turn on, or all of them will turn on and remain on. If the controller was designed to use 5 amp CTs then it may be possible to use the existing CTs depending upon the burden.
Thanks very much for your reply i will find and read that manual for sure. We assumed that the load is dispatched symmetrically between 3 phases that's why we are going to use only one CT for the capacitor bank's controller specifically (not for the main switch board right after Transformer which certainly needs 3 CTs and so on). You mentioned burden, do you mean the burden of secondary winding? how can i measure that? and do you think saturation of the CT will not happen if we use one CT for 2 purposes (capacitor bank controller and switch board ammeter? Thanks again
 
Shahram said:
Thanks very much for your reply i will find and read that manual for sure. We assumed that the load is dispatched symmetrically between 3 phases that's why we are going to use only one CT for the capacitor bank's controller specifically (not for the main switch board right after Transformer which certainly needs 3 CTs and so on). You mentioned burden, do you mean the burden of secondary winding? how can i measure that? and do you think saturation of the CT will not happen if we use one CT for 2 purposes (capacitor bank controller and switch board ammeter? Thanks again
Bt
Asymptotic said:
Carefully and thoroughly study the power factor controller manual. The controllers I'm familiar with have CTs measuring current through each phase, potential transformers measuring line-to-line voltage across each phase, and use this information to determine how many cap banks must be turned on to obtain the power factor set point.

Transformer and CT phasing and 'polarity' must be correct. If they aren't, chances are none of the cap banks will turn on, or all of them will turn on and remain on. If the controller was designed to use 5 amp CTs then it may be possible to use the existing CTs depending upon the burden.
Btw, i just remembered that the manufacturer of the capacitor bank used a controller that uses only one CT.
 
Shahram said:
Thanks very much for your reply i will find and read that manual for sure. We assumed that the load is dispatched symmetrically between 3 phases that's why we are going to use only one CT for the capacitor bank's controller specifically (not for the main switch board right after Transformer which certainly needs 3 CTs and so on). You mentioned burden, do you mean the burden of secondary winding? how can i measure that? and do you think saturation of the CT will not happen if we use one CT for 2 purposes (capacitor bank controller and switch board ammeter? Thanks again
Do a search on "current transformer burden". Adding the controller may add too much burden to the existing CT secondary. If so, install another CT to be used exclusively by the controller.
 
  • #10
Asymptotic said:
Do a search on "current transformer burden". Adding the controller may add too much burden to the existing CT secondary. If so, install another CT to be used exclusively by the controller.
Thanks a lot, I will check CT burden.
 
  • #11
Ali, you should check with the manufacturer of the capacitor bank/controller. They should know if what you are doing will work on their equipment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Shahram
  • #12
Be aware that some places use one set of CT's for indication and control
and another set for protective relaying.
They're kept separate because of the importance of protective relays to equipment and personnel safety.

That you plan to use a CT that already drives an indicator 'feels' reassuring. Be doggone sure you don't disturb your protective relay schemes.

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
  • #13
russ_watters said:
Ali, you should check with the manufacturer of the capacitor bank/controller. They should know if what you are doing will work on their equipment.
Thanks for your reply, i have already talked to the manufacturer of the capacitor bank and they didn't give any useful information to solve this issue. I should ask for its manual from them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #14
jim hardy said:
Be aware that some places use one set of CT's for indication and control
and another set for protective relaying.
They're kept separate because of the importance of protective relays to equipment and personnel safety.

That you plan to use a CT that already drives an indicator 'feels' reassuring. Be doggone sure you don't disturb your protective relay schemes.

old jim
Thanks very much jim, if I'm not mistaken cl 0.5 FS 5 indicates that the CT's I'm trying to use are not for protective purposes. Am I correct?
 
  • #15
Shahram said:
if I'm not mistaken cl 0.5 FS 5 indicates that the CT's I'm trying to use are not for protective purposes. Am I correct?
That's a 68 page document that I'm not going to study at length. You should have posted a link to it - here's the one i found...
https://w3.siemens.com/powerdistribution/global/sitecollectiondocuments/en/mv/indoor-devices/protective-measuring-transformers-m4/catalogue-protective-and-measuring-transformers-m4_en.pdf
Pages 9 and 10 indeed suggest that your transformer is designed for non-protective application.
It's encumbent on you though to make sure a predecessor hasn't mistakenly mixed control with protection so that you won't compound an existing error.
If you find that situation you must apprise your client.

So you've got to learn at least the minimal details of whatever machine it is you're about to modify.
That's just everyday being a 'thorough and responsible engineer'.old jim
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, Tom.G, Shahram and 1 other person
  • #16
jim hardy said:
That's a 68 page document that I'm not going to study at length. You should have posted a link to it - here's the one i found...
https://w3.siemens.com/powerdistribution/global/sitecollectiondocuments/en/mv/indoor-devices/protective-measuring-transformers-m4/catalogue-protective-and-measuring-transformers-m4_en.pdf
Pages 9 and 10 indeed suggest that your transformer is designed for non-protective application.
It's encumbent on you though to make sure a predecessor hasn't mistakenly mixed control with protection so that you won't compound an existing error.
If you find that situation you must apprise your client.

So you've got to learn at least the minimal details of whatever machine it is you're about to modify.
That's just everyday being a 'thorough and responsible engineer'.old jim
Thanks very much indeed, you gave me a great information. Yes, you are right i should make sure if they didn't mix control with protection mistakenly. Thanks again Jim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
12K