The work energy theorem in polar coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the work-energy theorem applied to a mass m in circular motion on a frictionless table, where the radius changes from l1 to l2 due to a string being pulled. The work done in pulling the string is equal to the increase in kinetic energy of the mass, expressed mathematically as W = m(l_{2}^2\omega^{2}_{2} - l_{1}^2\omega^{2}_{1}). Key equations include \int \boldsymbol{F}\cdot d\boldsymbol{r} and a_{r}=r\omega^{2}+\ddot{r}. The solution involves evaluating the work done through integration and applying conservation of angular momentum, despite initial confusion regarding the application of Newton's laws.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy theorem
  • Familiarity with circular motion dynamics
  • Knowledge of angular momentum conservation
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about angular momentum conservation in rotational dynamics
  • Practice evaluating integrals involving force and displacement
  • Explore Newton's laws of motion in the context of circular motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone studying mechanics, particularly those focusing on dynamics and energy principles in circular motion.

Order
Messages
96
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Mass m whirls on a frictionless table, held to circular motion by a string which passes through a hole in the table. The string is slowly pulled through the hole so that the radius of the circle changes from l1 to l2. Show that the work done in pulling the string equals the increase in kinetic energy of the mass.

Homework Equations



\int \boldsymbol{F}\cdot d\boldsymbol{r}
a_{r}=r\omega^{2}+\ddot{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm sorry that I don't have much to say about the solution. I want a hint because I have tried so hard. The work can anyway be evaluated to
\int \boldsymbol{F}\cdot d\boldsymbol{r}=\int_{l_1}^{l_2}m(r\omega^{2}+ \ddot{r} )dr=m\int_{l_1}^{l_2}r\omega^{2}+m\int_{l_1}^{l_2}\ddot{r}dr

The second term is easily evaluated using the substition dr=dr/dt*dt this is because you can derivate
\frac{d}{dt}(m\frac{v^2}{2})=mv\frac{dv}{dt}
Now you know that the result of the first term should be
m\frac{r^2\omega^{2}}{2}
I try to make a similar approach as with the second term and therefore evaluate
\frac{d}{dt}(m\frac{r^2\omega^{2}}{2})=mr\omega( \frac{dr}{dt} \omega+\frac{d\omega}{dt}r)
The result is two terms, so how can I find a variable substitution? Now it is easy to find a solution once you know that
\omega=\omega_0 \sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r}}
This might be found by setting up a force diagram and finding a differential equation. But there are two problems here. First we don't know anything about the force (except that it is weak) and secondly the result will be in time t not in position r. So therefore my pessimism is still.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry that I don't have much to say about the solution. I want a hint because I have tried so hard. The work can anyway be evaluated to
\int \boldsymbol{F}\cdot d\boldsymbol{r}=\int_{l_1}^{l_2}m(r\omega^{2}+ \ddot{r} )dr=m\int_{l_1}^{l_2}r\omega^{2}+m\int_{l_1}^{l_2}\ddot{r}dr
The second term is easily evaluated using the substition dr=dr/dt*dt this is because you can derivate
\frac{d}{dt}(m\frac{v^2}{2})=mv\frac{dv}{dt}

Actually, the second term can be taken as 0. The string is slowly being pulled in, so acceleration in r is negligible.

The result is two terms, so how can I find a variable substitution? Now it is easy to find a solution once you know that
\omega=\omega_0 \sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r}}

Try the conservation of angular momentum.
 
ideasrule said:
Try the conservation of angular momentum.

Ok, I use the differential m(r + dr)(\omega + d \omega )^{2} - mr\omega^{2}=0 to arrive at the differential equation 2 \frac{d \omega}{\omega}=-\frac{dr}{r} which gives the desired result.

Now I can integrate m \int_{l_{1}}^{l_{2}} r \omega^{2}_{0}\frac{r_{0}}{r}dr=m \omega^{2}_{0}r_{0}(l_{2}-l_{1})=m(l_{2}^2\omega^{2}_{2}-l_{1}^2\omega^{2}_{1})=m(v_{\theta}^2(l_{2})-v_{\theta}^2(l_{1}))
One problem here is that a factor 1/2 is missing.

But another problem is that the problem is in the chapter of Newtons laws, before angular momentum is discussed (that is why I don't know about it). Is there no way to solve this problem using Newtons laws?!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K