Theoretical.... medical physics?

In summary, the individual is considering a graduate program in either medical physics or nuclear physics, but is struggling to decide which sub-field to apply to. They are considering a few different fields, but are just not sure if they are a good fit. They are also considering looking for a position in a specific field, but are not sure if that is an option.
  • #1
Dishsoap
1,017
310
For all of you who are thinking I'm a complete doofus... you're right :oldeyes:

Unfortunately, I'm getting ready to apply for graduate school, and I'm still deciding which sub-field to apply to.

On one hand, I would feel most at home doing research with practical applications, especially in the medical field. I don't plan to cure cancer or the common cold, but the thought of solving physics problems with the end goal being to save someone's life (or make it a little more comfortable) is very appealing to me.

At the same time, I have somewhat of an aversion to experimental work. I've worked with 3 groups - 1 numerical/theoretical, and 2 experimental. I learned a lot doing the experimental work, and I can certainly see how people are fascinated by what can sometimes be a giant puzzle, but it's just not my thing.

I am struggling to find a sub-field of physics which is right for me. I did an REU in biophysics this summer, and it didn't really appeal to me (something something motor proteins :oldconfused::oldconfused:).

I was hoping to see that some universities would have a group which brought medical physics together with HEP to study proton therapies or something, but I couldn't find such a thing. I was wondering if someone with my particular interests might be fine applying for nuclear physics, particle physics, biophysics... I just haven't a clue. Is there even such a niche for me in the grand scheme of things?

Thanks :oldtongue:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You might not personally find a 'cure for cancer', but there are effective nuclear therapies which are quite reliable.
Maybe working in that field and becoming expert in their application might suit you.
 
  • #3
It can be tough figuring out what you want to do in the long term.

Medical physics isn't exactly that field for someone with an aversion to experimental work. Although, Iabs were never my favourite aspect of physics as an undergraduate and I'm pretty happy in the field. (For the record, I suspect I would have enjoyed labs a lot more had I been a little more organized.) There is a lot of computational work in medical physics though: Monte Carlo simulations, image reconstruction, deformable image registration, motion tracking, biological modeling, process engineering, computer-assisted detection algorithms, etc.

You might just want to do a search for proton therapy centres if that's what you're interested in. In the US there are about 15 currently in operation with another 10 or so planning to come online. Most will have a web-page that details the research they do, and from there you can see which academic institutions and graduate programs they're affiliated with.

Keep searching. You'll find something.
 
  • #4
I know a couple of nuclear theorists who do medical physics work (nuclear physics of 12C beams for heavy ion therapies, modelling of auger cascade processes), so theoretical medical physics certainly exists, and there's work to do. As far as I know, GEANT4 is very dominant in modelling of ion therapy, which is ... problematic. We can do better.

Approach this like you'd approach trying to find any grad position - try to find groups who do what you want to do, and see what they do. But, you're better off looking at nuclear physics, not HEP!
 
  • Like
Likes Dishsoap
  • #5
Excellent, thank you all for your advice. I spoke to some of my professors today in regards to this, and they said that nuclear physics is sort of a dying field. Is this true?
 
  • #6
Dishsoap said:
Excellent, thank you all for your advice. I spoke to some of my professors today in regards to this, and they said that nuclear physics is sort of a dying field. Is this true?
I certainly don't think so. It's a well established field, and a lot of the low hanging fruit is gone, but there's a whole heap of things we don't know. Nuclear physics is hard, but not finished. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34677838/strongstubborn.png [Broken]
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.00508.pdf

Perhaps if you're in the US, you can get a bit of an impression it's dying, with the closure of some small labs (e.g. Yale), but then again, at NSCL (MSU), they're building a ~ 1 billion dollar accelerator for radioactive beams (FRIB). And you know, the world is bigger than the US.

Further, obviously, medical physics is not dying, and nuclear methods are a huge part of medical physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is theoretical medical physics?

Theoretical medical physics is a branch of medical physics that focuses on using mathematical and theoretical models to understand and predict the behavior of physical processes and phenomena in medicine.

2. How is theoretical medical physics different from other branches of medical physics?

Theoretical medical physics differs from other branches of medical physics, such as diagnostic or therapeutic medical physics, in that it primarily focuses on developing and testing theoretical models and concepts rather than directly applying them in medical practice.

3. What are the applications of theoretical medical physics?

Theoretical medical physics has various applications in medical research, including understanding the effects of radiation on biological systems, developing new imaging techniques, and improving treatment planning in radiation therapy.

4. What skills are required to work in theoretical medical physics?

To work in theoretical medical physics, one must have a strong background in mathematics, physics, and biology. Additionally, critical thinking, problem-solving, and computer programming skills are essential for developing and testing theoretical models.

5. What is the future of theoretical medical physics?

Theoretical medical physics is a rapidly growing field, and its future looks promising. With advancements in technology and the increasing need for more accurate and efficient medical treatments, the demand for theoretical medical physicists is expected to increase in the coming years.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
29
Views
392
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
227
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
937
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
970
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Back
Top