Theoretical velocities at different heights sliding down an inclined plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical velocities of an object sliding down an inclined plane at different heights. The original poster presents calculations involving gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy to determine speeds at various heights, expressing confusion about the impact of slope steepness on these speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate velocities at different heights using energy principles but questions whether their approach adequately considers the steepness of the slope. Participants raise points about the relationship between acceleration, time, and speed on different slopes.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a productive exploration of the concepts involved, with some providing guidance on how slope steepness affects acceleration and speed. The discussion is ongoing, with participants clarifying their understanding of the relationship between these factors.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion as a high school student, indicating a potential gap in understanding the relationship between slope steepness and speed. There is a mention of a demonstration that may aid in visualizing these concepts.

helloworld2941
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
For a report, I am trying to work out the theoretical velocity of a person at different points on a slide based on height. Disregarding frictional forces and air resistance and assuming a uniform acceleration (straight slide), can I work out somewhat accurate velocities using the principle of conservation of mechanical energy?
Max slide height 6m and weight of person 80kg
I have done two calculations, one at height 3m and one at bottom.
Relevant Equations
U = mgh
k = 1/2 mv^2
At 3m:
U = 3 x 9.8 x 80
= 2352J

U at 6m = 6 x 9.8 x 80
= 4704J

k = 1/2mv^2
(4704-2352)J = 1/2 (80) v^2
v = 7.67 m/s

At 0m (bottom):
U = 0
4704J = 1/2 (80) v^2
= 10.84 m/s

Okay so what is bothering me here is just that my working doesn't take into account the steepness of the slope? And in my mind from the seemingly "logical" thinking wouldn't a steeper slope produce different speeds in the middle of the slide (though bottom is the same?)
Thank you for any help! This has really confused me (struggling high school student)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
helloworld2941 said:
Okay so what is bothering me here is just that my working doesn't take into account the steepness of the slope? And in my mind from the seemingly "logical" thinking wouldn't a steeper slope produce different speeds in the middle of the slide (though bottom is the same?)
Welcome to Physics Forums!

The acceleration down the slide depends on the steepness. Maybe you've studied this? The speed depends not only on the acceleration but also on the duration of the acceleration. For different amounts of slope, does it take different amounts of time to reach the middle of the slide? Can you see how it might be possible for the speed to be the same at the middle for two different slopes even though the acceleration is different for the two slopes?
 
Watch this classic "Racing balls" demonstration. It will inform your intuition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: helloworld2941
kuruman said:
Watch this classic "Racing balls" demonstration. It will inform your intuition.

That's such a simple but informative video! Thank you
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
TSny said:
Welcome to Physics Forums!

The acceleration down the slide depends on the steepness. Maybe you've studied this? The speed depends not only on the acceleration but also on the duration of the acceleration. For different amounts of slope, does it take different amounts of time to reach the middle of the slide? Can you see how it might be possible for the speed to be the same at the middle for two different slopes even though the acceleration is different for the two slopes?
So they are not mutually exclusive factors? I think I understand it now. Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K