Thermal Expansion of A-36 Steel Rails: -20F to 90F

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the required gap between A-36 steel rails to accommodate thermal expansion from -20°F to 90°F. The calculated deformation is 0.34848 inches, and there is debate on whether this expansion is split between both ends of the rail, suggesting that each side would expand by approximately 0.17424 inches. Participants highlight that adjacent rails will also expand, potentially necessitating a larger total gap to prevent buckling. Concerns are raised about the practical implications for railroad engineers, particularly regarding the uniformity of rail placement and the potential for asymmetrical movement. The conversation also touches on the transition to continuous welded rail (CWR) systems, which eliminate gaps and may mitigate expansion issues through tension management.
gv3
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The 40 ft long A-36 steel rails on a train track are laid with a small gap between them to allow for thermal expansion. Determine the required gap in inches so that the rails just touch one another when the temperature is increased from -20 F to 90 F. The cross sectional area of each rail is 5.10 in2.
engineering.jpg


So i was able to find out the deformation on the rail. My question is, does the .34848in get split between both ends of the rail since both sides are free ends? So each side would expand .17424in?

Homework Equations


δ=αΔTL[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


δ=αΔTL= .34848 in[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it make any difference?
Consider having a large number of rails, as in reality you would. Then think about the total expansion of the rails, then the total gap required, then the gap between each rail.
 
Merlin3189 said:
Does it make any difference?
Consider having a large number of rails, as in reality you would. Then think about the total expansion of the rails, then the total gap required, then the gap between each rail.
well because i was thinking that not only will the rail in the middle expand, but the one on the left and right of it would also expand. So if the deformation wasn't split between both ends, the gap would have to be 2δ. Because the rail in the middle will expand by δ and the rails next to it will also expand by δ.
 
Yes, one side would expand 0.1742, but the adjacent rail would also expand by that much.
 
  • Like
Likes gv3
I think that is what is intended to happen. My point was simply about the calculation.

But I wonder if that may be a practical problem for RR engineers? The rail doesn't know which way it is supposed to move, so if the spikes and ties aren't uniform, the rail could move slightly asymmetrically when it expands and contracts. Over years perhaps the rails could creep and make the gaps vary in size?

Anyhow, over here we are moving to continuous welded rail, so there are no gaps any more. What happens when the rails warm up, I don't know. I think some CWR is laid hot, so that it lives in various states of tension. Maybe with stronger ties and fixings expansion forces can now be resisted and not cause buckling?
 
  • Like
Likes gv3
Back
Top